Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Let AnA_n be an n×nn\times n matrix of 00's and 11's and let jj be an integer with 2≤j≤n−12\le j\le n-1 (display (1.1)). Let kj(n)k_j(n) be the least number of 11's in AnA_n that guarantees a j×jj\times j minor all of whose entries are 11 (p. 50). Then for every such jj

(1.5)kj(n)<1+jn+[(j−1)1/j n(2j−1)/j],\text{(1.5)}\qquad k_j(n)<1+jn+\bigl[(j-1)^{1/j}\,n^{(2j-1)/j}\bigr],

where [x][x] is the integral part; the right-hand side is denoted kj∗(n)k_j^*(n). The case j=2j=2 is (1.4), k2(n)<1+2n+[n3/2]k_2(n)<1+2n+[n^{3/2}], and (1.3) gives lim⁡n→∞k2(n)/n3/2=1\lim_{n\to\infty}k_2(n)/n^{3/2}=1. Note (2j−1)/j=2−1/j(2j-1)/j=2-1/j.

Graph form (3.1), p. 52. A saturated even graph of type (j,j)(j,j) is a complete bipartite subgraph with jj vertices in each class. For 2j≤n2j\le n, if Hj(n)H_j(n) is the minimal number of edges of a graph of order nn that ensures such a subgraph, then

(3.1)Hj(n)≤hj∗(n)wherehj∗(n)=1+[12kj∗(n)],\text{(3.1)}\qquad H_j(n)\le h_j^*(n)\quad\text{where}\quad h_j^*(n)=1+\Bigl[\tfrac12k_j^*(n)\Bigr],

"i. e. the existence of hj∗(n)h_j^*(n) edges in a graph of order nn already ensures the existence of a saturated even graph of the type (j,j)(j,j)." In the catalog's notation, ex⁡(n;Kj,j)<hj∗(n)\operatorname{ex}(n;K_{j,j})<h_j^*(n), so ex⁡(n;Kj,j)≤12(j−1)1/jn2−1/j+12jn+O(1)\operatorname{ex}(n;K_{j,j})\le\tfrac12(j-1)^{1/j}n^{2-1/j}+\tfrac12jn+O(1). Section 2 (p. 51) notes that (1.5) is nontrivial, kj∗(n)<n2k_j^*(n)<n^2, once j≥8j\ge8 and n≥j2j/(j−1)n\ge j^{2j/(j-1)} (display (2.1)).

Source. T. Kővári, V. T. Sós and P. Turán, On a problem of K. Zarankiewicz, Colloq. Math. 3 (1954), 50--57; (1.5) on printed p. 50 and (3.1) on printed p. 52 (PDF p. 1, left half, and PDF p. 2, left half, of the retained two-up image-only scan), read on the page images at 200 dpi. The artifact is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: (1.1)--(1.5), (2.1) and (3.1) were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof of (1.5) (Section 4) was read for structure and not checked; the deduction of (3.1) (p. 52) was read.

Proof pointer

Section 4 (pp. 53--54): if the number of 11's exceeds U=jn+(j−1)1/jn(2j−1)/jU=jn+(j-1)^{1/j}n^{(2j-1)/j} (display (4.1)), Hölder's inequality (4.2) applied to the row sums k1,…,knk_1,\ldots,k_n gives ∑ν(kνj)>(j−1)(nj)\sum_\nu\binom{k_\nu}{j}>(j-1)\binom nj (display (4.5)); the (kνj)\binom{k_\nu}j column jj-sets of the rows then contain some jj-set of columns in at least jj rows, which is the required minor. For (3.1), the adjacency matrix of a graph with hj∗(n)h_j^*(n) edges has at least kj∗(n)k_j^*(n) ones (the matrix is symmetric with zero diagonal), so it has a j×jj\times j minor of 11's whose row and column indices are disjoint, and the corresponding vertices span a Kj,jK_{j,j} after discarding extra edges.

Dependencies

Hölder's inequality; counting.

Bears on

  • Problem 714: the upper bound ex⁡(n;Kr,r)≪n2−1/r\operatorname{ex}(n;K_{r,r})\ll n^{2-1/r} for every r≥2r\ge2, the ceiling the problem asks to match from below.