Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Let and be the integers of a binomial coefficient , and let be a prime. If divides , then
Equivalently, if is defined by , then the exponent of in is at most ; this is the form in which the print concludes its proof. The print states the lemma with no range on and ; the theorem applies it in its binomial form, with .
Source. P. Erdős, A theorem of Sylvester and Schur, J. London Math. Soc. 9 (1934), no. 4, 282--288, DOI 10.1112/jlms/s1-9.4.282; the unnumbered lemma and its proof on printed p. 283 (PDF p. 2 of the seven-page offprint scan, read on the page image). The source card is [[factorials_binomials/erdos_1934_theorem_sylvester_schur/_index|A theorem of Sylvester and Schur]].
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image. The short proof was read and is sketched below; it is not independently verified.
Proof pointer
By Legendre's formula the exponent of in is the sum over of . Each such term is or , since , and the terms with vanish. So at most terms are nonzero, where .
Dependencies
Legendre's formula for the exponent of a prime in a factorial. Nothing else.
Use in the paper
Under the hypothesis that has no prime factor greater than , the lemma bounds the coefficient by ; with for this settles the theorem for (p. 283), and with for for (p. 284). For and it gives the bound of the coefficient by nested products of primes up to , , , and so on (p. 284).
Bears on
- Problem 961: the lemma is a step of Erdős's proof (pp. 283--288) of the theorem, which in that problem's notation is the bound ; the lemma alone gives no bound on .