Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. On an edge-deletion problem of Erdős, Hajnal and Szemerédi, the seven-page exposition hosted by Bloom (https://www.erdosproblems.com/static/74-proof.pdf, accessed 2026-09-05), unnumbered joining lemma, pp. 3–4. The source's case verification is expanded below.
Statement. Let satisfy on every edge. Let , where is proper on and is proper on . Assume at heights , and at heights . There is a proper three-coloring agreeing with on and with on , and satisfying
Proof scope. Complete rewritten proof with the finite color cases made explicit; no external theorem is needed.
Proof. Use below and including level , and at and above level . Define the two intermediate levels by this table:
| at | at | |
|---|---|---|
All entries are defined because both input colors are binary there. Edges wholly in or remain proper. No edge can skip a height level.
For an edge within either intermediate level, or between these two levels, both and are proper and binary at its endpoints. Their ordered color pairs must therefore be or , in either order. The first pair receives and on either level. For the second pair, the endpoint receives on either level, and the other receives or . So these edges are proper.
For an edge from height to height , the table's color at the upper endpoint is either its -color or . The lower endpoint uses its binary -color, different from the upper endpoint's -color. For an edge from height to height , the table's color at the lower endpoint is either its -color or . The upper endpoint uses its binary -color, different from the lower endpoint's -color. This proves properness at both boundaries without assuming is proper or binary on level . Every edge has now been considered. Finally, above the resulting color is exactly , which proves the asserted location of color .
Use. The height is truncated distance from the endpoints of earlier deletions in Proposition 4.1.
Bears on. Problem 74.