Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Theorem 1 (p. 251). For an infinite increasing sequence of integers b1<b2<⋯b_1<b_2<\cdots, with g(n)g(n) "the number of solutions of n=bibjn=b_ib_j": if g(n)>0g(n)>0 for every n>n0n>n_0 (display (1)), then lim sup⁡n→∞g(n)=∞\limsup_{n\to\infty}g(n)=\infty (display (2)).

The page does not say whether i=ji=j is allowed or whether ordered pairs are counted. The paper's abstract (p. 251) states the stronger form "If g(n)>0g(n)>0 for a sequence nn of positive upper density then lim sup⁡g(n)=∞\limsup g(n)=\infty", which Theorem 4 (p. 252) implies.

Source. P. Erdős, On the multiplicative representation of integers, Israel J. Math. 2 (1964), no. 4, 251--261 (received 17 December 1964); Theorem 1 on printed p. 251 (PDF p. 1 of the eleven-page scan), read on the page image. The proof is completed on p. 254 together with Theorem 2 ("which proves Theorems 1 and 2").

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the two sentences that follow it (Raikov's theorem (3) and the reduction) were read clause by clause on the page image. The proof (pp. 252--254, through Theorem 2 and the Lemma) was read on the page images for its structure and not checked step by step.

Proof pointer

Page 251: by Raikov's theorem (the paper's [5]), hypothesis (1) gives B(x)=∑bi≤x1>c1x/(log⁡x)1/2B(x)=\sum_{b_i\le x}1>c_1x/(\log x)^{1/2} for infinitely many xx (display (3)), so it is enough to derive (2) from (3) holding for infinitely many xx. Page 252 observes that Theorem 1 would follow from ul(n)=O(n/(log⁡n)1/2)u_l(n)=O(n/(\log n)^{1/2}), and Theorem 2 supplies the smaller bound u2k(n)<c2n(log⁡log⁡n)k+1/log⁡nu_{2^k}(n)<c_2n(\log\log n)^{k+1}/\log n, proved on pp. 253--254 from the paper's Lemma and Landau's asymptotic for integers with kk prime factors.

Dependencies

Raikov's theorem (the paper's [5]) and Theorem 2.

Bears on

  • Problem 796: the paper's qualitative result on representation functions; the problem's quantitative question concerns Theorem 3 of the same paper.