Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (pp. 1, 4). means , and is the length of the longest prime chain .
Passage in Section 1.3 (p. 4; the print gives it no label). Define the chain by letting be the smallest prime congruent to modulo . Linnik's theorem gives for some constant , hence . The paper adds that it is conjectured that for some fixed , and that this would imply the much stronger bound .
The paper uses the chain only to exhibit large values of ; it states no theorem about it and does not name the source of the conjecture.
Proof pointer
The Linnik bound is a citation (Linnik's theorem on the least prime in an arithmetic progression); the deduction is immediate by induction. The conjectured bound is not proved.
Read depth
Claims checked: the remark was read clause by clause on the print (p. 4). Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. External input: Linnik's theorem.
Source. Kevin Ford, Sergei V. Konyagin and Florian Luca, Prime chains and Pratt trees, Geom. Funct. Anal. 20 (2010), no. 5, 1231--1258, doi:10.1007/s00039-010-0089-0, arXiv:0904.0473; page numbers are those of the arXiv version 4 named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 695: the chain is a sequence of the kind the problem considers. The paper does not mention the problem. Reading the remark against its second question (whether some such sequence has ): the conjectured gives , so by induction and the chain would answer that question yes. The conjecture is unproved, and the unconditional Linnik bound gives only , far from the required growth. The remark does not bear on the first question.