Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Unsolved problem (p. 2): "For each integer m≥1m\ge1, what is the least number of integers one can have in the set {a/gcd⁡(a,b):a,b∈A}\{a/\gcd(a,b):a,b\in A\}, where AA is a set of mm distinct positive integers?"

The paper introduces it as a combinatorial route to Graham's conjecture that max⁡a,b∈Aa/gcd⁡(a,b)≥m\max_{a,b\in A}a/\gcd(a,b)\ge m: the set of ratios need not have mm elements, since A={2,3,4,6,9,12,18}A=\{2,3,4,6,9,12,18\} gives {1,2,3,4,6,9}\{1,2,3,4,6,9\} (display (1)). Writing each a∈Aa\in A as p1a1⋯pnanp_1^{a_1}\cdots p_n^{a_n} over the primes dividing members of AA and a=(a1,…,an)\mathbf a=(a_1,\ldots,a_n), the ratio a/gcd⁡(a,b)a/\gcd(a,b) has the exponent vector δ(a,b)=(max⁡{0,ai−bi})i\delta(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)=(\max\{0,a_i-b_i\})_i, so the problem is restated: for each m≥1m\ge1, what is the least number of vectors in δ(A)={δ(a,b):a,b∈A}\delta(A)=\{\delta(\mathbf a,\mathbf b):\mathbf a,\mathbf b\in A\} over sets AA of mm distinct vectors (with nonnegative integer entries; the paper says the restriction can be dropped "through a few minor technical tricks" left to the reader).

Lower bound (p. 2). ∣δ(A)∣≥m1/2|\delta(A)|\ge m^{1/2}: for fixed a∈A\mathbf a\in A the pairs (δ(a,b),δ(b,a))(\delta(\mathbf a,\mathbf b),\delta(\mathbf b,\mathbf a)), b∈A\mathbf b\in A, are distinct because b=a−δ(a,b)+δ(b,a)\mathbf b=\mathbf a-\delta(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)+\delta(\mathbf b,\mathbf a), so there are mm distinct pairs, and one of the two coordinate sets {δ(a,b)}\{\delta(\mathbf a,\mathbf b)\}, {δ(b,a)}\{\delta(\mathbf b,\mathbf a)\} has at least m1/2m^{1/2} elements. The paper credits this argument to nobody; the site and Erdős's 1973 survey credit the bound n1/2≪h(n)n^{1/2}\ll h(n) to Erdős and Szemerédi.

Source. A. Granville and F. Roesler, The set of differences of a given set, Amer. Math. Monthly 106 (1999), no. 4, 338--344; the two statements of the problem, the Remark and the lower-bound paragraph on p. 2 of the author preprint, read on the page image (the text layer drops inequality signs and braces). The journal version was not compared.

Read depth. Claims checked: the two statements, the Remark and the lower-bound argument were read clause by clause on the page image; the four-line argument was followed here and is complete as printed.

Proof pointer

The lower bound's argument is given in full above. The problem itself is open.

Dependencies

None.

Bears on

  • Problem 539: the problem is the site's question, with h(m)h(m) the least ∣δ(A)∣|\delta(A)|; the lower bound is the site's n1/2≪h(n)n^{1/2}\ll h(n), and the vector restatement is the formulation the site's commentary describes and the 2026 constructions use.