Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation as on the Theorem 1.4 page: SAS_A is the set of nonempty finite subset sums of AA and [x][x] the set of positive integers at most xx.

Theorem 1.5 (p. 2). There is a constant CC such that for every sufficiently large nn the following holds. If pp is a positive integer with p<n2/3(log⁡n)−Cp<n^{2/3}(\log n)^{-C} and A⊆[n/p]A\subseteq[n/p] has cardinality n1/3(log⁡n)Cn^{1/3}(\log n)^C, then pz2∈SApz^2\in S_A for some integer zz.

The paper calls this a seemingly more general form of Theorem 1.4 and notes (p. 3) that Theorem 1.4 is the case p=1p=1, while Theorem 1.4 gives many cases of Theorem 1.5: for pp square-free and B⊆[n/p]B\subseteq[n/p], a square among the subset sums of {pb:b∈B}\{pb: b\in B\} is the same as a number pz2pz^2 in SBS_B. The paper omits unnecessary floors and ceilings (p. 3), so the cardinality is read up to rounding.

Proof pointer

The general pp is needed for an iteration (pp. 4--5). The main lemma, Lemma 2.4 (p. 5), finds a subset A′A' of at most n1/3(log⁡n)C/3n^{1/3}(\log n)^{C/3} elements, with A′′=A∖A′A''=A\setminus A', such that SA′S_{A'} contains a long arithmetic progression, or a large proper generalized arithmetic progression of rank 2, whose base point is pz2pz^2 modulo its common step, or else every element of A′′A'' is divisible by one integer d>1d>1. In the third case the argument iterates with A′′A'' in place of AA (p. 5), and the paper bounds the number of iterations by O(log⁡n)O(\log n). Lemma 2.4 is proved in Section 8 (pp. 21--26) from Lemma 3.6, a subset-sum structure lemma built on ideas of Szemerédi and Vu, and the number-theoretic Lemma 4.3, which Section 7 proves with Lemma 4.2. Section 9 (pp. 26--27) finds pz2pz^2 in the progression in the rank one case directly; Section 10 (pp. 27--32) handles the rank two case through Proposition 10.1, proved by Poisson summation with Lemma 4.2.

Read depth

Claims checked: the statement and the reduction remarks on p. 3 were read clause by clause on the arXiv print, and the outline above was read from Sections 2 to 4 and 7 to 10. The proofs were not checked here. A public Lean development reports a counterexample to a step in the proof of Lemma 4.2 (Section 6, pp. 14--17), which Sections 7 and 10 use; the claim page [[../wiki/problems/integer_sequences/E0587/claims/2008_11_09_nguyen_vu|of Nguyen and Vu]] records that report and the development's corrected route to the bound of Theorem 1.4, neither built nor audited here.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. External inputs named by the paper include the Szemerédi--Vu theorem on progressions in subset sums (Lemma 2.3, p. 4), Freiman-type inverse theorems (Lemmas 3.2 to 3.4, p. 6) and Ruzsa's covering lemma (Lemma 3.1, p. 6).

Source. H. H. Nguyen and V. H. Vu, Squares in sumsets, in An Irregular Mind, Bolyai Soc. Math. Stud. 21, Springer (2010), 491--524, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14444-8_14; arXiv:0811.1311v2, whose labels and pages are used here; the edition read is named on the source card.

Bears on

  • Problem 587: through its case p=1p=1, Theorem 1.4, the theorem gives the upper bound N1/3(log⁡N)CN^{1/3}(\log N)^C for the largest subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} with no square subset sum.