Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 5-01). For a set AA of non-negative integers, D(A)\mathcal D(A) is its ordinary-difference set, the non-negative integers that are differences of two elements of AA, and ∣E∣x|E|_x is the number of elements of EE less than xx.

Theorem 4 (p. 5-03), stated as a consequence of Theorem 6 of Stewart and Tijdeman's paper on infinite-difference sets. Let E\mathcal E be any countable set of infinite sets of positive integers, and let α\alpha be any number between 00 and 11. Then there is a set AA with density α\alpha such that

lim sup⁡x→∞∣D(A)∩E∣x∣E∣x≤2αfor every E∈E.\limsup_{x\to\infty}\frac{|\mathcal D(A)\cap E|_x}{|E|_x}\le2\alpha \qquad\text{for every }E\in\mathcal E.

Consequence (p. 5-03). Taking E\mathcal E to be the set of all infinite arithmetic progressions and α\alpha any number between 00 and 1/21/2, there is a set of density α\alpha whose difference set contains no infinite arithmetic progression. The survey offers this against the expectation, which Theorems 1 and 2 might suggest, that D(A)\mathcal D(A) contains an infinite arithmetic progression whenever AA has positive upper density.

Proof pointer

The survey gives no proof; it derives the theorem from Theorem 6 of Stewart and Tijdeman, On infinite-difference sets of sequences of positive integers (reference [14] of the survey, Canad. J. Math.). The consequence holds because an infinite arithmetic progression EE inside D(A)\mathcal D(A) would give relative upper density 1>2α1>2\alpha.

Read depth

Claims checked: Theorem 4 and its consequence were read clause by clause on the page image of the print. The proof is not in the survey and was not checked.

Dependencies

None in the corpus. External input: Theorem 6 of the cited Stewart-Tijdeman paper.

Source. Cam L. Stewart, On difference sets of sets of integers, Séminaire Delange-Pisot-Poitou, Théorie des nombres, 19e année (1977/78), Fasc. 1, Exp. No. 5, 8 pp.; pages are cited by the print's own numbering 5-01 to 5-08, as on the source card.

Bears on

No Erdős problem page of the corpus cites this theorem.