Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Example 2.1, preprint pp. 3--4, "cf. Erdős and Straus [6], Theorem 2.26". Read on the rendered pages.
Statement and argument
Example 2.1 (pp. 3--4): and are irrational, being Euler's totient function and the sum of the positive divisors of . The paper writes each sum as , with or , and gives a one-line reason for each: and at primes , with the bounds and , which it states for all (they hold for ); for it names Lemma 2.1 and (3) as the tools.
The mechanism (Lemma 2.1 and its Remark, p. 3, and formula (3)): with and , a rational sum makes the tails integers for all large , while (3), from , gives for large ; at a large prime , , so , which is impossible. For the same argument runs with for , and the sign reversed. (The identity supplies the rewriting.)
Relation to problem 252
is the case of problem 252. This example is an elementary reproof; the paper refers to Erdős–Straus 1971, Theorem 2.26, and the rational independence of , and is Erdős–Straus 1974, Theorem 3.7 with . Nothing here concerns for , where is not .
Bears on. #252 (the case ).