Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 2.1 and its proof, preprint p. 4, with the preceding paragraph on Oppenheim [6]. Read on the rendered page.
Statement
For integer sequences with every and , if some irrational is a limit point of the ratios , then the (convergent) series is irrational.
Corollary 2.1 (p. 4): if exists and is irrational, is irrational. Oppenheim (Amer. Math. Monthly 61 (1954), 235--241) had the same conclusion under .
Proof (p. 4), summarized
If , then for all (Lemma 2.1). Along a subsequence ; since , . From and (with ), the integers tend to , so is rational, a contradiction.
Role
Not used for the prime series of this library's problems: for and the hypothesis fails, and for , the ratios tend to infinity. Recorded for the card's coverage.
Bears on. No catalog problem directly.