Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Theorem 5.1 and Remark 5.1, preprint p. 11, with the opening of Section 5 (p. 11); Theorem 5.2 (p. 11, proof p. 12), Examples 5.1--5.2 (p. 12) and Example 5.3 (p. 13) for the related constructions. Read on the rendered pages. The paper is cited by its record on the source card.
Statement
For a sequence and a positive integer put (). Let be an integer and a sequence of positive integers such that converges and for all . Let . Then there are with
Remark 5.1 (p. 11): every nondecreasing sequence of positive integers with convergent satisfies the condition, so the theorem applies to all such sequences. The opening of Section 5 records that Hančl and Tijdeman had the case , , for nondecreasing and . The proof chooses greedily from the position of the current remainder relative to and sets .
Related constructions
- Theorem 5.2 (p. 11): for an integer and positive integers with convergent and for , every is with ; Example 5.1 (p. 12) gives as a sequence meeting these conditions.
- Example 5.2 (p. 12): with for , every is with ; the paper calls this in some sense a counterpart to Theorems 3.1, 4.1 and 4.2.
- Example 5.3 (p. 13): for integers , and , every is with .
The paper closes Section 5 (p. 13) with two questions it calls open: for an integer , positive integers with convergent and distinct integers , whether there is a fixed interval each of whose points is with every , and whether there are infinitely many such representations.
Role
The paper presents these constructions (p. 2) as showing that the results of Sections 3 and 4 do not hold without growth restrictions. For instance, with and , the th prime, Remark 5.1 applies, so every number in , where , is for some ; this specialization is the corpus's, and it says nothing about the rationality of itself.
Bears on. No catalog problem directly.