Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

The two maps (p. 1). The Collatz function is C(x)=3x+1C(x)=3x+1 for x≡1(mod2)x\equiv1\pmod2 and C(x)=x/2C(x)=x/2 for x≡0(mod2)x\equiv0\pmod2. The 3x+13x+1 function is T(x)=(3x+1)/2T(x)=(3x+1)/2 for x≡1(mod2)x\equiv1\pmod2 and T(x)=x/2T(x)=x/2 for x≡0(mod2)x\equiv0\pmod2. The survey records the relation T(x)=C(C(x))T(x)=C(C(x)) for odd xx and T(x)=C(x)T(x)=C(x) for even xx, so that iterating TT omits some of the steps of iterating CC; it credits the observation that TT is the more convenient map for analysis to Terras (its [88], [89]) and Everett (its [27]), independently.

3x+13x+1 Conjecture (p. 1, unnumbered), quoted: "Starting from any positive integer nn, iterations of the function C(x)C(x) will eventually reach the number 1. Thereafter iterations will cycle, taking successive values 1,4,2,1,…1,4,2,1,\ldots."

Reformulations stated in the survey. Backwards (p. 4): let S0S_0 be the smallest set of integers that contains 11 and is closed under the maps x↦2xx\mapsto2x and 3x+2↦2x+13x+2\mapsto2x+1, the second applied only to inputs 3x+23x+2 for which 2x+12x+1 is an integer; the conjecture then says that S0S_0 is the set of all positive integers. Through powers of 22 (p. 13): the conjecture can be restated as saying that from every positive integer nn some iterate C(k)(n)C^{(k)}(n) of the Collatz function, or of the 3x+13x+1 function, is a power of 22.

Source. J. C. Lagarias, The 3x+13x+1 problem: an overview, in The Ultimate Challenge: The 3x+13x+1 Problem (AMS, 2010), 3--29; the arXiv:2111.02635v1 copy, p. 1 (the maps and the conjecture), p. 4 (the set S0S_0) and p. 13 (the power-of-2 form), read on the page images. The edition read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions, the conjecture and the two reformulations were read clause by clause on the page images. The conjecture is open; nothing here is a proof, and nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

None: the statement is a conjecture. The equivalences with the backward and power-of-2 forms are asserted in the survey without proof. The backward form rests on the observation that the inverse images of yy under TT are 2y2y and, when y=3x+2y=3x+2, the odd integer 2x+12x+1; so the two maps generate from 11 exactly the positive integers whose TT-orbit contains 11 (a remark of this page, not of the survey).

Dependencies

None.

Bears on

  • Problem 1135: the problem's map ff is the survey's TT, and its question, whether every m≥1m\ge1 has some k≥1k\ge1 with f(k)(m)=1f^{(k)}(m)=1, is the survey's 3x+13x+1 Conjecture stated for TT in place of CC. The survey poses the conjecture for CC; by the relation T(x)=C(C(x))T(x)=C(C(x)) (xx odd), T(x)=C(x)T(x)=C(x) (xx even) the TT-orbit of mm is the CC-orbit with some terms left out, and the two orbits reach 11 together, as the problem page's map remark explains. The survey states the conjecture and proves nothing about it.