Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Setting

A rectifiable curve σ\sigma, z=Zσ(s)z=Z_\sigma(s) with s∈[0,∣σ∣]s\in[0,|\sigma|] the arc-length parameter, and its secant variation Ψ(σ)\Psi(\sigma) are as on the Lemma 1 page (definitions (4)--(5), p. 52). For a curve with bounded rotation of the tangent (a Radon curve), Φ(σ)\Phi(\sigma) is the total variation of a single-valued branch of Arg⁡Zσ′(s)\operatorname{Arg}Z_\sigma'(s), and Ψ(σ)≤2Ψ0(σ)≤2(π+Φ(σ))\Psi(\sigma)\le2\Psi_0(\sigma)\le2(\pi+\Phi(\sigma)) (p. 53).

Statement

Theorem 2 (p. 56). Let σ\sigma be rectifiable with Ψ(σ)<∞\Psi(\sigma)<\infty, let EE be a compact subset of C\mathbb C, and let E={s∈[0,∣σ∣]:Zσ(s)∈E}\mathcal E=\{s\in[0,|\sigma|]:Z_\sigma(s)\in E\}. Then for every rational function RR of degree at most nn with no poles on σ\sigma,

∥R′∥L1(E∩σ):=∫E∣R′(Zσ(s))∣ ds≤nΨ(σ)∥R∥C(E∩σ).(13)\|R'\|_{L_1(E\cap\sigma)}:=\int_{\mathcal E}|R'(Z_\sigma(s))|\,ds \le n\Psi(\sigma)\|R\|_{C(E\cap\sigma)}. \tag{13}

Consequence (p. 57). For σ⊂E\sigma\subset E,

var⁡σR:=∫0∣σ∣∣R′(Zσ(s))∣ ds≤nΨ(σ)∥R∥C(σ)≤2n(π+Φ(σ))∥R∥C(σ),(14)\operatorname{var}_\sigma R:=\int_0^{|\sigma|}|R'(Z_\sigma(s))|\,ds \le n\Psi(\sigma)\|R\|_{C(\sigma)} \le 2n(\pi+\Phi(\sigma))\|R\|_{C(\sigma)}, \tag{14}

the last inequality being meaningful for Radon curves. The first inequality in (14) is sharp: for R(z)=znR(z)=z^n and the circle σ={z=reit:t∈[0,2π]}\sigma=\{z=re^{it}:t\in[0,2\pi]\}, r>0r>0, one has Ψ(σ)=2π\Psi(\sigma)=2\pi and equality. For a circle σ\sigma, (13) reads ∥R′∥L1(E∩σ)≤2πn∥R∥C(E∩σ)\|R'\|_{L_1(E\cap\sigma)}\le2\pi n\|R\|_{C(E\cap\sigma)}, which the paper attributes to Dolzhenko (Anal. Math. 4 (1978)).

Proof pointer

P. 57. Apply Lemma 1a (p. 56; see the Lemma 1 page) with EE replaced by R(E)R(E) and σ\sigma by the image curve R(σ)R(\sigma); the image of the part of σ\sigma over E\mathcal E has length, counted with multiplicity, ∥R′∥L1(E∩σ)\|R'\|_{L_1(E\cap\sigma)}. Lemma 4 (p. 56) gives Ψ(R(σ))≤nΨ(σ)\Psi(R(\sigma))\le n\Psi(\sigma), since the argument of (R−A)/(R−B)(R-A)/(R-B) splits into the arguments of nn factors (ζ−aj)/(ζ−bj)(\zeta-a_j)/(\zeta-b_j) over the AA- and BB-points of RR; and γ(R(E∩σ))≤∥R∥C(E∩σ)\gamma(R(E\cap\sigma))\le\|R\|_{C(E\cap\sigma)}, since a closed disc of radius ρ\rho has analytic capacity ρ\rho.

Dependencies

Lemma 1a (p. 56), which rests on Lemma 1 and Remark 1 (pp. 53--56); Lemma 4 (p. 56).

Source. V. I. Danchenko, The lengths of lemniscates. Variations of rational functions, Mat. Sb. 198 (2007), no. 8, 51--58 (in Russian); pages are the journal's, as on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, (14), the sharpness example and the circle case read on the print; the proof (p. 57) and Lemmas 1a and 4 (p. 56) read but not checked step by step. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Bears on

No Erdős problem directly. The theorem is the paper's companion estimate for rational functions; it does not bear on the length question of #114 beyond sharing the method of Theorem 1.