Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation (p. 125): ff is a monic polynomial (1), EE the set where ∣f∣<1|f|<1, DD the open unit disk, Dˉ\bar D its closure and CC the unit circle; ∣⋅∣|\cdot| on plane sets is area.

Theorem 4 (p. 133). "If all zνz_\nu lie in Dˉ\bar D, then ∣E∣≤4{π∣E∩D∣}1/2|E|\leq4\{\pi|E\cap D|\}^{1/2}."

Corollary (p. 133). "For the class of functions (1) with all zνz_\nu on CC, inf⁡∣E∣=0\inf|E|=0."

The corollary combines the theorem with what the paper draws from MacLane's theorem (its [5], Theorem A) on p. 133: for zeros on CC, inf⁡∣E∩D∣=0\inf|E\cap D|=0. The paper records (pp. 132--133) that this refutes the statement of Erdős's 1940 note (its [2], p. 958) that the area of EE exceeds a positive universal constant when the zeros lie in Dˉ\bar D, a statement it says rested on an unpublished erroneous argument.

Source. P. Erdős, F. Herzog, G. Piranian, Metric properties of polynomials, J. Analyse Math. 6 (1958), 125--148, doi:10.1007/BF02790232; Theorem 4, the Corollary and the proof on p. 133. The copy read is identified on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: the theorem, the corollary and the MacLane paragraph were read on the page images of pp. 132--133 on 2026-10-08; the proof was read and its steps followed, not independently checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Page 133. With zeros in Dˉ\bar D, EE lies in ∣z∣≤2|z|\le2, and ∣f(reiϑ)∣<∣f((2−r)eiϑ)∣|f(re^{i\vartheta})|<|f((2-r)e^{i\vartheta})| for 0<r<10<r<1, so every point of EE outside DD is the image of a point of E∩DE\cap D under w(reiϑ)=(2−r)eiϑw(re^{i\vartheta})=(2-r)e^{i\vartheta}. That map multiplies area by (2−r)/r(2-r)/r, a decreasing function of rr, so a set of area SS in DD has an image of area at most 4πS−S4\sqrt{\pi S}-S, the value for the disk of area SS about the origin. Adding ∣E∩D∣|E\cap D| gives the theorem.

Dependencies

MacLane's Theorem A (the paper's [5]) for the corollary; nothing else in the paper.

Bears on

  • #116: the least area αn\alpha_n of Problem 2 is taken over zeros in Dˉ\bar D, which includes zeros on CC, so the corollary gives inf⁡nαn=0\inf_n\alpha_n=0; the problem asks how fast it can decrease. The step from the corollary to αn\alpha_n is drawn here.
  • #1040: for F=CF=C the corollary is μ(C)=0\mu(C)=0, and since C⊂DˉC\subset\bar D, μ(Dˉ)=0\mu(\bar D)=0 follows; both sets have transfinite diameter 11. The paper itself says (p. 136) that the disk case of Problem 4 follows from Theorem 4.