Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation as on the relations (7)--(11) page.
(14) (p. 296). As ,
That is, for each fixed rank the sequences decrease in and converge to , the th positive zero of the derivative of . The paper presents (14) as showing that (12) is best possible in a certain sense (p. 296). Remark (i) (p. 297) rephrases the first part: the th positive zero of the derivative of the partial product
of decreases to as , .
(15) (p. 297), a corollary of (14): for ,
so the left members of (13) tend to the right members.
Open questions (Remark (ii), p. 297; restated in Section 5, p. 299). The paper leaves unanswered whether either convergence in (15) is monotonic in . It likewise notes that (14) makes the second differences , and the corresponding ones for , converge to as , and asks whether that convergence is monotonic. Section 5 says that the monotonicity in question is, in that context, decreasing.
Read depth. Claims checked: (14), (15) and Remarks (i) and (ii) were read on the page images of pp. 296--297, and the restatement on p. 299. The proof was followed but not checked step by step.
Proof pointer
Pp. 296--297. By (9) and (7) the limits and exist, and by (7) and (10) it suffices to identify them. The polynomial has the same critical points as and converges to uniformly on every finite interval, so is the unique extremum point of between and , namely . The same reasoning applies to .
Dependencies
(7), (9) and (10) on the relations (7)--(11) page; the product formula for .
Bears on
Problem 1114: context only. Remark (ii) restates Bálint's verification of Erdős's conjecture as for and each fixed , with the corresponding inequality for (p. 297), and asks whether the convergence of these second differences as is monotonic. That question is the paper's own; the problem fixes the polynomial and compares gaps in .