Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Printed p. 273, with the number of integers , , having a prime factor greater than (defined on p. 271), the greatest prime factor of , the number of with , and (2) de Bruijn's asymptotic (p. 272). Erdős writes for "the smallest integer with ". The Chinese remainder theorem gives at once , where are the consecutive primes above . Counting gives far more: at least integers have , since every run of consecutive integers up to contains one, and (2) then yields, for ,
Erdős's comment on (6) and his conjecture (7) (p. 273): "I think (6) is fairly sharp. I feel sure that for every and
I am very far from being able to prove (7), in fact can not even show which seems a ridiculously weak result. The best that I can show is for a certain ."
So is the least such that each of has a prime factor greater than . In the notation of Problem 962, where is the largest for which some has every divisible by a prime , one has exactly when , so (an observation made here). Under this inverse, (6) gives (a substitution made here: with , the exponent of (6) is , which is at most for large whenever ); the conjecture (7) is , the site's displayed question ; the reported bound gives for some ; and the unproved is . These translations are the page's own one-line substitutions, named as such; the site's Problem 962 commentary states the same translated bounds.
Source. P. Erdős, Problems and results on consecutive integers, Publ. Math. Debrecen 23 (1976), no. 3--4, 271--282, DOI 10.5486/pmd.1976.23.3-4.15 (Crossref record read); the twelve-page scan read for this page (printed pp. 271--282 = PDF pp. 1--12, no text layer); the passage on printed p. 273 (PDF p. 3), with the definitions on pp. 271--272 (PDF pp. 1--2), read on the page images.
Read depth. Claims checked: the passage was read clause by clause on the page image. The proof of (6) is the four-line argument printed (the Chinese remainder theorem bound, then the counting of -smooth integers below against de Bruijn's asymptotic (2)); its "simple computation" was not carried out here. The bound is asserted without proof or reference. (7) is a conjecture.
Proof pointer
As printed: every -smooth block of consecutive integers below contributes to , and the blocks with each contain at least one integer with all prime factors (otherwise would not be minimal), so ; comparing with de Bruijn's , where "a little faster than " (p. 272), bounds the exponent of by . The same pigeonhole with the Dickman--de Bruijn asymptotic, carried out with constants, is the argument of a 2025 forum note on Problem 962 (Tang), recorded on that problem's page as a lead.
Dependencies
De Bruijn's asymptotic (2) for the count of -smooth integers up to (N. G. de Bruijn, Indag. Math. 13 (1951), 50--60, the paper's [1]).
Bears on
- Problem 962: Erdős's 1976 bounds for the inverse function of , his conjecture (7), which is the problem's displayed question, and his remark that (6) is "fairly sharp".