Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Proposition 4.1, p. 14, with its proof on pp. 14--16, of Ben Green and Imre Z. Ruzsa, On the arithmetic Kakeya conjecture of Katz and Tao, arXiv:1712.02108 (2017); the edition read is named on the source card.

Statement

Notation. Fk′(N)F'_k(N) (p. 5) is the size of the smallest set $A\subset\mathbb Z$ containing an arithmetic progression of length kk and common difference dd for NN different values of dd.

Proposition 4.1 (p. 14). Let Gk(N)G_k(N) be the minimum, over all intervals II of length kpNkp_N and all choices of primes p1<⋯<pNp_1<\cdots<p_N, of #(I∩⋃i=1NpiZ)\#\bigl(I\cap\bigcup_{i=1}^N p_i\mathbb Z\bigr). Then

Fk′(N)≤Gk(N)≤kFk′(N).F'_k(N)\le G_k(N)\le kF'_k(N).

In particular Conjectures 1' and 5 (see Theorem 1.1) are equivalent.

Combined with Theorem 1.2 and Fk′(N)≤Fk(N)F'_k(N)\le F_k(N) (p. 6), the upper bound gives Gk(N)≤kN1−c/log⁡log⁡k+o(1)G_k(N)\le kN^{1-c/\log\log k+o(1)} as N→∞N\to\infty, with c>0c>0 absolute; the paper states the consequence as γk≫1/log⁡log⁡k\gamma_k\gg1/\log\log k in Conjecture 5 (p. 4).

Proof pointer

Lower bound: the multiples of the pip_i in an extremal interval contain a kk-term progression with difference pip_i for each ii. Upper bound: take an extremal set AA of positive integers with progressions of differences d1,…,dNd_1,\ldots,d_N; the theorem of Green and Tao cited as the paper's reference [10, Theorem 1.2] gives u,vu,v with all of v,u+v,…,dNu+vv,u+v,\ldots,d_Nu+v prime in a short range [(1−δ)X,X][(1-\delta)X,X]; set pi=diu+vp_i=d_iu+v, choose ww by the Chinese remainder theorem with pi∣w+uaip_i\mid w+ua_i, and check that an interval of length kpNkp_N placed at ww meets each piZp_i\mathbb Z exactly in the progression w+uai+jpiw+ua_i+jp_i, 0≤j<k0\le j<k, inside w+u⋅A+{0,v,…,(k−1)v}w+u\cdot A+\{0,v,\ldots,(k-1)v\}, a set of at most kFk′(N)kF'_k(N) elements. The remark after the proof (p. 16) says simpler arguments would do at the cost of logarithmic losses.

Read depth

Claims checked: the definition of Gk(N)G_k(N), the statement and the proof on pp. 14--16 were read clause by clause on the print. The cited theorem of Green and Tao was not read. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

External input: Green and Tao, the paper's reference [10], Theorem 1.2.

Bears on

  • Problem 1143: for an integer α=k\alpha=k, Gk(N)G_k(N) is the least value of that problem's count FkpN(p1,…,pN)F_{kp_N}(p_1,\ldots,p_N) over NN primes. The proposition places it between Fk′(N)F'_k(N) and kFk′(N)kF'_k(N), so the problem's least count for fixed integer α\alpha is, up to a factor kk, the arithmetic Kakeya quantity Fk′(N)F'_k(N); with Theorem 1.2 it is at most kN1−c/log⁡log⁡k+o(1)kN^{1-c/\log\log k+o(1)}. It settles no exact value or order of the count.