Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Theorem 1.3 (p. 3).
That is, for infinitely many . The paper stresses (p. 3) that the proof uses none of Zhang's technology and relies only on the Bombieri--Vinogradov theorem, and that the constant 600 is not optimal.
Source. J. Maynard, Small gaps between primes, Ann. of Math. (2) 181 (2015), no. 1, 383--413, doi:10.4007/annals.2015.181.1.7, read in the arXiv:1311.4600v3 preprint (28 October 2019) identified on the source card; the pages cited are the preprint's printed pages, not the journal's. Theorem 1.3 on p. 3, the proof on p. 6.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and the deduction on p. 6 were read clause by clause. The numerical bound (Proposition 4.3 (2), proved in Section 8, pp. 21--24) was read for its structure and not recomputed, and the admissible 105-set of diameter 600 listed in the footnote on p. 6 was not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
P. 6. Take . Proposition 4.3 (2) gives , and Bombieri--Vinogradov gives level of distribution , so for small . Then Proposition 4.2 gives for any admissible , and an admissible set with , credited to unpublished computations of Thomas Engelsma, is listed in the footnote.
Dependencies
Proposition 4.2 and Proposition 4.3 (2) of the same paper; the Bombieri--Vinogradov theorem.