Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 4). Write . The paper recalls Erdős's 1948 theorem (2.12), , and quotes his 1955 remark that "One would of course conjecture that" and (2.13), "but these conjectures seem very difficult to prove."
Theorem 5 (p. 4). As ,
The first inequality says for infinitely many , and the second that for infinitely many ; together they give both parts of (2.13).
Proof pointer
Page 11; the paper proves the second inequality and says the first is analogous. From an admissible -tuple, , the Main Theorem, together with Selberg's upper-bound sieve (Lemma 3, p. 7), gives positions and a sequence along which at least integers make , consecutive primes (6.6), so the gap is bounded. If the next gap were at most times it for all of these, Lemma 3 and the singular-series average (Lemma 4, p. 8) would bound their number by (6.11) with , too few once is small.
Read depth
Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the printed pages of arXiv:1305.6289v1, and the proof on p. 11 was followed. The first inequality's proof is not written out in the paper. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
The Main Theorem (p. 6) and Lemmas 3 and 4 (pp. 7--8) of this paper, the lemmas taken from earlier works cited there.
Source. János Pintz, Polignac numbers, conjectures of Erdős on gaps between primes, arithmetic progressions in primes, and the bounded gap conjecture, arXiv:1305.6289v1 (2013); published in From Arithmetic to Zeta-Functions, Springer (2016), 367--384, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28203-9_22. Labels and pages here are those of arXiv v1. The edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
None recorded. Problem 218 also compares consecutive gaps, but asks about the density of with and about infinitely many with ; Theorem 5 answers neither.