Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Let be the set of numbers with , where is the least prime divisor of . The Schinzel–Szekeres set consists of the primitive elements of : those elements of with no proper divisor in (p. 262). Every element of is divisible by an element of , and every element of exceeds (used on pp. 262 and 265).
Lemma 2.1 (printed p. 262). If and , then the least common multiple of and exceeds .
The paper prints the least common multiple as and introduces the lemma as a property that "is easily seen to have"; no proof is printed.
Source. I. Z. Ruzsa, On the small sieve. II. Sifting by composite numbers, J. Number Theory 14 (1982), 260–268; Section 2, Lemma 2.1 on printed p. 262. The edition is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the definitions and the statement were read on the page images.
Proof pointer
No proof is printed. One argument, written here: by primitivity neither of divides the other. Say the least prime factor of is at most the least prime factor of . Then has only prime factors at least , so .
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- Problem 542: the lemma says that , a set of integers in , satisfies the problem's hypothesis that pairwise least common multiples exceed . With Lemma 2.5 it gives such a set leaving at most integers up to divisible by none of its elements.