Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


For A2A_2 in Lemma 3.1,

M(A2)≪x/log⁡2x.(1)M(A_2)\ll x/\log^2x. \tag{1}

The same bound holds with φ\varphi replaced by either σ\sigma or ψ\psi. The common sign calculation below explicitly supplies this part of the later analogues.

Proof. Write ℓ=log⁡x\ell=\log x and let ff be one of the three functions. Put ϵ=−1\epsilon=-1 for φ\varphi and ϵ=1\epsilon=1 for σ,ψ\sigma,\psi. For an admissible representation n=dpsn=dps, coprimality and the fact that ss has at most two prime factors greater than pLpL give

f(n)=f(d)d(1+ϵp+O ⁣(1pL))n.(2)f(n)=\frac{f(d)}d \left(1+\frac{\epsilon}{p} +O\!\left(\frac1{pL}\right)\right)n. \tag{2}

The error is absolute and uniform. For a repeated prime factor of ss, the formulas for σ(r2)/r2=1+1/r+1/r2\sigma(r^2)/r^2=1+1/r+1/r^2 and ψ(r2)/r2=1+1/r\psi(r^2)/r^2=1+1/r give the same bound; the totient case is immediate. Moreover n>dp2Ln>dp^2L, so d<x/(p2L)d<x/(p^2L).

Let B⊂A2B\subset A_2 be a set on which ff is nondecreasing. Count all admissible representations for its elements, allowing overcounting. For P=2mP=2^m and P/2<p≤PP/2<p\le P, write a(m,d)a(m,d) for the number of these representations with that fixed dd. Only L<P<2xL<P<2\sqrt x and d<4x/(P2L)d<4x/(P^2L) can contribute. We prove

a(m,d)≪xdℓ4.(3)a(m,d)\ll \frac{x}{d\ell^4}. \tag{3}

There are O(ℓ)O(\ell) possible mm, and ∑d≤4x1/d=O(ℓ)\sum_{d\le4x}1/d=O(\ell), so (3) implies (1).

Fix m,dm,d. Partition (1,x](1,x] into consecutive half-open intervals IiI_i of ratio 1+δ1+\delta, with δ=1/(Pℓ5)\delta=1/(P\ell^5), truncating the last one. There are O(Pℓ6)O(P\ell^6) intervals. Partition (P/2,P](P/2,P] into consecutive intervals JkJ_k of ratio 1+η1+\eta, with η=ℓ−4\eta=\ell^{-4}, again truncating the last one. There are O(ℓ4)O(\ell^4) intervals. Let Hi,kH_{i,k} be the closed convex hull of the numbers n∈B∩Iin\in B\cap I_i having a counted representation with p∈Jkp\in J_k. It may be empty or a singleton, with length zero.

If k′≥k+2k'\ge k+2, counted primes p∈Jkp\in J_k and p′∈Jk′p'\in J_{k'} satisfy p′≥(1+η)pp'\ge(1+\eta)p. For counted n,n′n,n' in the same IiI_i, n′/n=1+O(δ)n'/n=1+O(\delta). Formula (2) therefore shows that the difference between f(n′)/(f(d)n/d)f(n')/(f(d)n/d) and f(n)/(f(d)n/d)f(n)/(f(d)n/d) has the sign of

ϵ(1/p′−1/p).\epsilon(1/p'-1/p).

Indeed its magnitude from this term is at least c/(Pℓ4)c/(P\ell^4), whereas the total error is O(1/(Pℓ5)+1/(PL))O(1/(P\ell^5)+1/(PL)). For all sufficiently large xx, that error is smaller. All quotients are legitimate because f(d)>0f(d)>0.

Thus for φ\varphi one has f(n′)>f(n)f(n')>f(n), forcing n′>nn'>n by monotonicity on BB; for σ,ψ\sigma,\psi one has f(n′)<f(n)f(n')<f(n), forcing n′<nn'<n. Consequently hulls whose indices differ by at least two are strictly separated, in one direction or the other. Within a fixed ii they overlap at most twice. Hulls for different ii are disjoint, so

∑i,k∣Hi,k∣≤2x.(4)\sum_{i,k}|H_{i,k}|\le2x. \tag{4}

All assertions about empty hulls are vacuous. Strict separation for nonempty hulls follows because they are hulls of finite sets.

For fixed pp, the number of positive integers ss with dpsdps in a hull of length hh is at most h/(dp)+1h/(dp)+1. Dropping the primality condition when bounding the number of pp in each JkJ_k gives

∑p∈Jk1dp≪1d(ℓ−4+P−1)≪1d(ℓ−4+L−1).\sum_{p\in J_k}\frac1{dp} \ll\frac1d\left(\ell^{-4}+P^{-1}\right) \ll\frac1d(\ell^{-4}+L^{-1}).

The main length terms in the count are therefore, by (4), at most Cx(ℓ−4+L−1)/dCx(\ell^{-4}+L^{-1})/d. The total of the +1+1 terms is at most

O(Pℓ6)⋅O(P)=O(P2ℓ6)≪xℓ6dL,O(P\ell^6)\cdot O(P)=O(P^2\ell^6) \ll\frac{x\ell^6}{dL},

using the necessary bound d<4x/(P2L)d<4x/(P^2L). As L=ℓ10L=\ell^{10}, these estimates prove (3), including the hulls of length zero. □\square

The original proposition is the totient case. The positive-sign version above supplies the source's stated reversal for σ\sigma and ψ\psi; it uses no unproved monotonicity of their ratios.

Source. Tao, published paper, published pp.805–808, Proposition 3.3; pp.816–819 for the analogues. This page uses that published version.

Bears on. Problem 49.