Suppose there exist C0,X0 such that for all real x≥X0
and every positive integer j with 2j≤2logx,
#{p≤x:p prime, ⌈p/2j⌉ prime}≤log2x(log2x)3C0x.(1)
Then, for all sufficiently large x,
M(x)−π(x)≫x/log2x.(2)
The constant in (1) is uniform in j. This is a conditional obstruction
under the stated shortage, not a result obtained by assuming the
Dickson–Hardy–Littlewood conjecture.
Proof. Put ℓ=logx, u=logℓ, and let k0 be the
unique integer with ℓ<2k0≤2ℓ. Then k0=O(u).
Form
A={2kp≤x:1≤k≤k0, p an odd prime}.
Its representations are unique by the exponent of two, so
∣A∣=∑k=1k0(π(x/2k)−1) for large x.
The second-order PNT expansion is uniform on
x/(2ℓ)≤x/2k≤x/2. Expanding the logarithms, with
klog2=o(ℓ) uniformly, gives
∣A∣=k=1∑k0(2kℓx+2kℓ2(1+klog2)x+O(2kℓ3(1+k2)x))−k0.
The error sums to O(x/ℓ3), since
∑k≥1(1+k2)2−k<∞. Also
k=1∑k02−k=1−2−k0≥1−ℓ−1,k=1∑k0k2−k=2−(k0+2)2−k0=2+O(u/ℓ).
The negative tail in the first sum costs at most x/ℓ2;
the constant one in the second sum supplies x/ℓ2.
After absorbing k0, we obtain
∣A∣≥ℓx+ℓ2xlog4−O(ℓ3xu).(3)
An inversion in A has n=2kp<n′=2k′p′ but
φ(n)>φ(n′). Since both odd-prime totients are exact,
0<2k′p′−2kp<2k′−2k.
Thus k′>k, and division by 2k′ gives
0<p′−p/2k′−k<1−2k−k′<1.
Consequently p′=⌈p/2k′−k⌉.
For each pair k<k′, (1) bounds the possible p by
C0x/(ℓ2u3), since p≤x and
1≤k′−k≤k0. There are O(u2) such pairs.
The total number of inversions is therefore O(x/(ℓ2u)).
Delete one endpoint of each inversion, taking the union of those chosen
endpoints. At most that many elements are removed. Every inversion in
the remaining set would have been an original inversion whose chosen
endpoint was removed, so none remains. We obtain a monotone set A′
with
∣A′∣≥ℓx+(log4−o(1))ℓ2x.
Since π(x)=x/ℓ+x/ℓ2+O(x/ℓ3) and log4>1,
this proves (2). The sufficiently large threshold may depend on
C0,X0. □
Source precision. On published p.815, deleting
O(x/(ℓ2u)) elements is said to preserve (3) with its smaller
O(xu/ℓ3) error. The displayed o(x/ℓ2) conclusion above
is what the deletion proves, and it gives the same proposition.
The background prime-tuples domain and the separate Maynard comparison
are qualified in external_context.
Source. Tao, published paper, published pp.812–815, Proposition 4.5. This page uses that published version.
Bears on. Problem 49.