Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation as on the Theorem 1 page: f(n,H)f(n,H) is the largest number of colors on the edges of KnK^n with no totally multicolored (TMC) copy of HH, and ext(n,Kp−1)\mathrm{ext}(n,K^{p-1}) is the largest number of edges of a graph on nn vertices with no Kp−1K^{p-1}.

Theorem 4 (printed pp. 635--636). Let p≥4p\ge4. There exists npn_p such that if n>npn>n_p, then

(5)f(n,Kp)=ext(n,Kp−1)+1.\text{(5)}\qquad f(n,K^p)=\mathrm{ext}(n,K^{p-1})+1.

Second part, quoted (p. 636): "Further, if KnK^n is coloured by f(n,Kp)f(n,K^p) colours and it contains no TMC KnK^n [sic], then its colouring is uniquely determined: one can divide the vertices of KnK^n into dd classes A1,…,AdA_1,\ldots,A_d so that each edge joining vertices from different AiA_i's has its own colour (that is, a colour used only once) and each edge of form (x,y)(x,y) where xx and yy belong to the same AiA_i has the same colour, independent from x,yx,y and ii."

The printed "TMC KnK^n" is read here as TMC KpK^p, the hypothesis of the first part. The statement does not define dd; Theorem 1's definition gives d=p−2d=p-2 for H=KpH=K^p, since Kp−eK^p-e has chromatic number p−1p-1, and the proof (p. 641) takes d=p−2d=p-2. Remark 1 (p. 636) reads the second part as saying that an extremal coloring comes from an extremal graph for ext(n,Kp−1)\mathrm{ext}(n,K^{p-1}) by giving its edges distinct colors and the edges of its complement one extra color; it adds Dirac's theorem that ext(n,Kp−1)=ext(n,Kp−e)\mathrm{ext}(n,K^{p-1})=\mathrm{ext}(n,K^p-e), with the same extremal graph when n≥2pn\ge2p.

Source. P. Erdős, M. Simonovits and V. T. Sós, Anti-Ramsey theorems, Infinite and finite sets (Colloq., Keszthely, 1973), Vol. II, Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 10, North-Holland (1975), 633–643; the statement on printed pp. 635--636 with Remark 1 on p. 636, the proof in Section 3 on pp. 640--641. The edition is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: the statement and Remark 1 were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was read for structure only; it rests on a theorem the paper does not prove (see below). Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

Pp. 640--641. The proof uses a second theorem labeled Theorem 6 (p. 640), which the paper states without proof, saying it follows from Simonovits's paper on extremal graph problems with symmetrical extremal graphs (Discrete Math. 7 (1974), 349--376), or can be proved like its special case k=1k=1 in Simonovits's 1968 stability paper: for positive integers r,dr,d and k≤r/2k\le r/2, if T\mathcal T is the class of graphs obtained from Kd(r,…,r)K_d(r,\ldots,r) by adding kk edges, then ext(n,T)=ext(n,Kd+1)+k−1\mathrm{ext}(n,\mathcal T)=\mathrm{ext}(n,K_{d+1})+k-1 for n≥n0(r,d,k)n\ge n_0(r,d,k), the extremal graphs being a complete dd-partite graph with class sizes nin_i, ∑ni=n\sum n_i=n and ∣ni−nd∣≤1\lvert n_i-\frac nd\rvert\le1, plus k−1k-1 edges. With k=2k=2, r=5r=5 and d=p−2d=p-2, every member of T\mathcal T is a graph whose distinct coloring forces a TMC KpK^p whatever the other edges' colors, so Lemma 1 (p. 638) gives $1+\mathrm{ext}(n,K_{p-1})\le1+\mathrm{ext}(n,K_p-e)\le f(n,K_p)\le \mathrm{ext}(n,\mathcal T)=\mathrm{ext}(n,K_{p-1})+1$. (The paper's text calls this the assertion "(4)" [sic]; the displayed equation of Theorem 4 is (5).) For the uniqueness, one edge of each color of an extremal coloring forms an extremal graph for T\mathcal T, hence a complete (p−2)(p-2)-partite graph as above plus one edge ee; exchanging edges of the same color shows that every edge ff inside a class has the color of ee, unless nn is very small.

Dependencies

The paper's Lemma 1 (p. 638) and its unproved Theorem 6 of Section 3 (p. 640); neither has a page here.

Bears on

No problem page of this corpus.