Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 183). is an ordinal with no immediate predecessor, and is a graph whose vertex set has order type . An independent set of type is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices whose order type, in the order of the vertex set, is .
Conjecture (Erdős, Hajnal and Milner, the paper's reference [4]). Every contains an infinite path or an independent set of type .
What the paper reports (p. 183, without proof):
- The three authors proved the conjecture for every , and their method breaks down completely at .
- They proved that every contains a or an independent set of type , and in fact that every contains a or an independent set of type , where is the bipartite graph with white and black vertices (the paper writes and for complete bipartite graphs; is not quantified in the sentence).
- That proof was never published, because Laver (the paper's reference [5], printed with no title) proved their conjecture, quoted: "Let be an order type without fixed points. Then either contains or an independent set of type ."
Question (p. 183, quoted). "Is it true that every either contains a pentagon or an independent set of type ?"
Source. P. Erdős, Problems and results on finite and infinite graphs, Recent advances in graph theory (Proc. Second Czechoslovak Sympos., Prague, 1974), Academia, Prague, 1975, pp. 183--192; Section I, p. 183. The edition read is identified on the source card. Reference [4] is P. Erdős, A. Hajnal and E. Milner, Set mappings and polarized partition relations, Combinatorial theory and its applications, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970, 327--363.
Read depth. Claims checked: Section I was read clause by clause on the printed page. The paper gives no proofs of these statements.
Proof pointer
None in this paper; the results are reported with references [4] and [5].
Dependencies
None within the paper.
Bears on
- Problem 601: the problem asks for which limit ordinals every graph on has an infinite path or an independent set of order type ; the conjecture above asserts this for every ordinal with no immediate predecessor, and the paper reports the case and says that the method breaks down completely at .