Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Notation (printed p. 246): is the complete symmetric loopless digraph of order , the transitive tournament of order 3, and "the smallest order so that every digraph on a set of vertices either has an independent set of vertices (no arcs in either direction between vertices) or includes a transitive tournament of order ". The section opens (p. 248): "If a digraph contains no copies of , then for any vertex , the sets and are both independent sets."
Lemma 4.1 (printed p. 248). "For all , ."
Lemma 4.2 (printed p. 248). "For all , ."
The paper adds: "As a corollary we get the bound ."
In the problem's notation. in the letters of Problem 112, so the lemma is for , and in the letters of Ihringer, Rajendraprasad and Weinert , their Lemma 2.4, which they attribute to this paper.
Source. J. A. Larson and W. J. Mitchell, On a Problem of Erdős and Rado, Ann. Comb. 1 (1997), 245--252; Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 with their proofs and the corollary on printed p. 248 (PDF p. 4 of the publisher scan), read on the page image; the notation on p. 246 (PDF p. 2) and the value with Lemma 2.1 on p. 247 (PDF p. 3), read on the page images. The artifact is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: both statements, the opening remark and the corollary were read clause by clause on the page image. The two proofs (a paragraph and three lines) were read in full and followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Page 248: a paragraph for Lemma 4.1 and three lines for Lemma 4.2, which the sketch here follows. For Lemma 4.1, let be a digraph of order with no ; independent vertices are to be found. Fix a vertex . By the opening remark, and are independent (two vertices of joined by an arc would form an with , and likewise in ), so if either has at least vertices it is the required set. Otherwise has at most vertices, and the remaining set has at least vertices, so , having no , contains independent vertices; none of them is adjacent to , and adding gives . Lemma 4.2 is induction on : the base case is , a known value, and if then Lemma 4.1 gives .
Dependencies
Within the paper: the value (Lemma 2.1, p. 247, from Bermond's Proposition 2.4, with listed on p. 247), the base case; is elementary (a tournament on 4 vertices has a vertex of out-degree at least 2, whose two out-neighbors form a transitive triple with it, and the cyclic triangle shows ), as the Bermond result page Proposition 2.5 also records.
Bears on
- Problem 112: the bound that the site's commentary attributes to the paper, which the page had second-hand from the 2021 paper's Lemma 2.4; the 2021 paper's Proposition 3.4 sharpens it to , and its Theorem 1.2 gives the order . At the corollary is the upper half of the paper's bracket , whose lower half is Proposition 3.1.