Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
A chromatic graph is a set of points with every pair joined by an edge colored red or blue, that is, a two-coloring of the edges of ; a monochromatic triangle is a set of three points whose three joining edges have one color; two triangles are disjoint when they share no point; and is the largest number of mutually disjoint monochromatic triangles in (printed p. 259). is the greatest integer not exceeding .
Theorem (printed p. 259). For every chromatic graph on points,
and if and , then
The note adds (p. 261) that the reader can construct examples showing (1) best possible whenever and (2) does not apply, and prints none.
In the problem's notation (an observation made here). Problem 1015's , the largest number of vertices that some two-coloring of leaves uncovered by any family of disjoint monochromatic triangles, is the maximum of . By (2), for and ; by (1), , which is for , for and for , with equality exactly for the colorings of the unprinted remark; (2) lowers the last value to once , and at the pentagon coloring (Figure 1) has no monochromatic triangle, so all five vertices stay uncovered and . For the case of the Figure 6 coloring of Theorem 6 of Burr, Erdős and Spencer (two vertices joined by a red edge, blue to all others, all other pairs red) supplies the colorings with ; with (1) and (2) this gives , that is , and for , and , for every other than (the problem takes ). This is the case of that theorem's formula, which the theorem itself asserts only for sufficiently large . The maximum over is , the site's ", at least for ".
Source. J. W. Moon, Disjoint triangles in chromatic graphs, Math. Mag. 39 (1966), no. 5, 259--261; the Theorem, the definitions and facts A and B on printed p. 259 (PDF p. 2 of the archive's PDF), the proof on pp. 259--261 (PDF pp. 2--4), the remark on sharpness on p. 261 (PDF p. 4), read on the page images (the text layer garbles , the brackets and the inequality signs). The edition read is identified in the source digest.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement, the definitions, facts A and B and the closing remarks were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof was read in full on the page images and its three steps were followed; the claims made about Figures 2--4 in the case were read as printed and not re-derived. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Proof pointer
Pages 259--261. Facts A and B (p. 259, cited to Greenwood and Gleason): a point with three edges of one color forces a monochromatic triangle, so every has one (A), and a with none has exactly two edges of each color at every point (B). For (1): the upper bound counts points; if a maximal family of disjoint monochromatic triangles had members, at least six points would be uncovered and A would give a further disjoint monochromatic triangle. For (2), first : by A, and if then B, applied to the five points outside a monochromatic triangle, forces the pentagon coloring on them (Figure 1); if a triangle point and two pentagon points , form a blue triangle, B applied to the other five points forces two red edges from the pentagon point to the remaining triangle points, giving two disjoint monochromatic triangles (Figure 2); otherwise each triangle point is red to at least three consecutive pentagon points, two triangle points share at least two such pentagon points, and two configurations remain: the first (Figure 3) contains two disjoint red triangles, and in the second (Figure 4) the remaining triangle point must also be red to one of the pentagon points , , which again gives two disjoint red triangles. So . Then, for with , a family of disjoint monochromatic triangles leaves five points, which together with any one triangle of the family form a containing two disjoint monochromatic triangles; exchanging gives triangles.
Dependencies
Within the note: facts A and B (p. 259), which the note calls well known, citing as an example Greenwood and Gleason, Combinatorial relations and chromatic graphs, Canad. J. Math. 7 (1955), 1--7, not held. The sharpness of the lower bound in (1) is the author's unprinted remark (p. 261); the corpus reads it off the case of the Figure 6 coloring of Burr, Erdős and Spencer, Theorem 6.
Bears on
- Problem 1015: the result the site credits to the note. Part (2) is the sentence Erdős restates in item 9 of the 1971 problem paper (printed p. 100); part (1) bounds the uncovered vertices by for and by for , so the theorem leaves at most four uncovered for every ; at the pentagon coloring (Figure 1) leaves all five uncovered. The note poses no question for .