Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (printed pp. 101–102): f(n,H)f(n,H) is the maximum rr for which there is a coloring of KnK_n by rr colors without a copy of HH all of whose edges have different colors (a totally multicolored, TMC, copy); PmP_m is the path on mm vertices. Theorem A (Theorem 2 of the paper's [6], Erdős, Simonovits and Sós): with H={H−e:e\mathcal H=\{H-e:e an edge of H}H\}, f(n,H)−ex(n,H)=o(n2)f(n,H)-\mathrm{ex}(n,\mathcal H)=o(n^2). The sentence before Theorem B (p. 102): "In Theorem B f(n;Pk)f(n;P_k) is determined for n>n0(k)n>n_0(k); f(n;Ck)f(n;C_k) is still unsettled for k≥5k\ge5. (See the conjecture in Section 3.)" The paper has Sections 1 and 2 and an unnumbered "Some open problems" (pp. 109–110) with Problems 1–2 on uniform colorings and Problem 3 on the largest and smallest numbers of colors that every rr-coloring of KnK_n must show on some copy of HH; no Section 3 and no restatement of the cycle conjecture appear in it.

Theorem B (p. 102). "There exists a constant cc such that if t≥5t\ge5, n>ct2n>ct^2, then for ε=0,1\varepsilon=0,1

(4)f(n,P2t+3+ε)=tn−(t+12)+1+ε.\text{(4)}\qquad f(n,P_{2t+3+\varepsilon})=tn-\binom{t+1}2+1+\varepsilon.

"

The extremal coloring (p. 102): split the vertices of KnK_n into a1,…,ata_1,\ldots,a_t and b1,…,bn−tb_1,\ldots,b_{n-t}, give each of the (t2)+t(n−t)\binom t2+t(n-t) edges that meet some aia_i its own color, and give all edges among the bib_i one further color. No TMC path of this coloring has more than 2t+22t+2 vertices, so it contains no TMC P2t+3+εP_{2t+3+\varepsilon}; with two colors on the edges among the bib_i instead, the longest TMC path has 2t+32t+3 vertices.

Remark 1 (pp. 102–103). "In fact we can prove the stronger theorem that (4) holds if n≥(5/2)t+cn\ge(5/2)t+c with an absolute constant cc and for every tt. Further, for t>t0t>t_0,

(∗)f(n,Pk)={(k−22)+1if k≤n≤5t+3+4ε2,tn−(t+12)+1+εif n≥5t+3+4ε2.(*)\qquad f(n,P_k)=\begin{cases}\binom{k-2}2+1&\text{if }k\le n\le\frac{5t+3+4\varepsilon}2,\\[4pt] tn-\binom{t+1}2+1+\varepsilon&\text{if }n\ge\frac{5t+3+4\varepsilon}2.\end{cases}

The omitted part of this more complete result can be proven by similar arguments as used in Theorem B but is more involved and rather lengthy. We have conjectured in ESS that (∗)(*) holds for all nn and tt." The stronger range and (∗)(*) are announced without proof; Yuan's 2021 introduction describes the claim in the same way ("without proof").

Source. M. Simonovits and V. T. Sós, On restricted colourings of KnK_n, Combinatorica 4 (1984), no. 1, 101–110, doi:10.1007/BF02579162 (Crossref record read; received 1 July 1983 per the first page); printed pp. 101–103 = PDF pp. 1–3 and pp. 109–110 = PDF pp. 9–10 of the repository scan, read on the page images (the text layer garbles the formulas). The copy read is identified in the source digest.

Read depth. Claims checked: Theorem A, the sentence before Theorem B, Theorem B with its extremal coloring, Remark 1 with (∗)(*), Remark 2 and Problems 1–3 were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof of Theorem B (Section 1, pp. 103–106) was read only for the outline under Proof pointer and was not checked.

Proof pointer

Section 1, "Proof of Theorem B" (pp. 103–106), from the Erdős–Gallai theorem ex(n,Ph)≤h−22n\mathrm{ex}(n,P_h)\le\frac{h-2}2n (quoted on p. 103) and its analog for cycles (p. 104). It takes a longest totally multicolored path PsP_s, picks one edge of each remaining color, and splits the vertices off the path into the three classes UU, VV, WW bounded in Lemma 1 (p. 104); Lemma 2 (p. 105) bounds by tt the number of path vertices a vertex of V∪WV\cup W is joined to, and Lemma 3 (p. 105) describes the coloring of a KnK_n that contains a totally multicolored Kt,t+2K_{t,t+2} but no totally multicolored P2t+3+εP_{2t+3+\varepsilon}. The count on p. 106 produces that Kt,t+2K_{t,t+2} when n>c⋅t2n>c\cdot t^2. The proof is restricted to t≥5t\ge5; the paper says the case t≤4t\le4 "can be proved by similar arguments but need to distinguish more cases" (p. 104), and gives no such proof. The proof was not checked here. Remark 2 (p. 103) derives the upper bounds (6) f(n,P2t+3)≤(t+12)nf(n,P_{2t+3})\le(t+\tfrac12)n and (7) f(n,P2t+4)≤(t+1)nf(n,P_{2t+4})\le(t+1)n from Erdős–Gallai by choosing one edge of each color.

Dependencies

Erdős and Gallai, On maximal paths and circuits of graphs, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 10 (1959), 337–356 (the paper's [4]), whose theorems on paths and on cycles are the results Section 1 says it uses (pp. 103–104). Theorem A of Erdős, Simonovits and Sós (1975) frames the problem and is not among them.

Bears on

  • Problem 1105: the path formula proved for t≥5t\ge5 (paths on at least 1313 vertices) and n>ct2n>ct^2, the range the site quotes as n≥ck2n\ge ck^2; the full range n≥k≥5n\ge k\ge5 is Yuan's (theorem_1); the cycle formula is called unsettled for k≥5k\ge5 on p. 102.