Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Section 5, printed p. 152 (published PDF). The source gives the constructions and rank formula briefly; their proofs are expanded here.

Statement. Restricting a finite matroid M=(E,F)M=(E,\mathcal F) to E0⊆EE_0\subseteq E preserves the rank of all its subsets. For D=E∖E0D=E\setminus E_0, choose any base JJ of the restriction to DD. The family

F0={I⊆E0:I∪J∈F}\mathcal F_0=\{I\subseteq E_0:I\cup J\in\mathcal F\}

is a matroid on E0E_0, independent of the chosen base JJ. Its rank is

r0(A)=r(A∪D)−r(D)(A⊆E0).(1)r_0(A)=r(A\cup D)-r(D)\qquad(A\subseteq E_0). \tag{1}

This is contraction of DD, followed by retaining the ground set E0E_0. The source calls it contraction to E0E_0.

Proof. For restriction, the independent subsets of A⊆E0A\subseteq E_0 are exactly the same as in MM, so heredity, the rank axiom and the rank value are unchanged.

For fixed JJ, the family F0\mathcal F_0 contains the empty set and is hereditary. If I,K∈F0I,K\in\mathcal F_0 and ∣I∣<∣K∣|I|<|K|, apply augmentation in MM to I∪JI\cup J and K∪JK\cup J. Their size difference is the same, and an augmenting element belongs to K∖IK\setminus I, because both contain JJ. This proves augmentation in F0\mathcal F_0, so it is a matroid.

Take a maximal member II of F0\mathcal F_0 inside AA. Then J∪IJ\cup I is maximal independent in D∪AD\cup A. An element of A∖IA\setminus I cannot be added by maximality in F0\mathcal F_0. An element of D∖JD\setminus J cannot be added because JJ is maximal independent in DD, and the larger set would contain the dependent set obtained by adding it to JJ. Thus

r(D∪A)=∣J∣+∣I∣=r(D)+r0(A),r(D\cup A)=|J|+|I|=r(D)+r_0(A),

which proves (1). This expression does not depend on JJ. In any matroid a subset is independent exactly when its rank equals its size. Hence the rank formula also proves that F0\mathcal F_0 is independent of the chosen base. □\square

In particular, if an independent seed JJ is contracted, then I⊆E∖JI\subseteq E\setminus J is independent in the contraction exactly when I∪JI\cup J is independent in the original matroid. Subsequent deletion of other prescribed seeds does not change ranks on the remaining subsets. These are the interfaces used in Theorem 1d and Theorem 2d.