Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Setting (p. 445). A family of subsets of a set has property B when some is such that no member of is contained in or in its complement . is the least integer for which some family of sets, each of elements, fails property B.
Theorem 1 (p. 445, quoted). "."
No range of is printed. The paper deduces (p. 445) that , and, with W. M. Schmidt's lower bound, records
It adds that a reasonable guess is that is of the order .
Refinement (6) (p. 446, stated without proof). Taking the ground set to have elements, a slightly more careful calculation is said to show that for every and ,
The paper adds that (6) seems unlikely to be improved much without a new idea.
Proof pointer
P. 446, proof of Theorem 1. Work inside a ground set of points and track the number of unordered pairs that split every one of the first chosen -sets; initially . For each surviving pair, since , , so and together contain at least of the -subsets of . Averaging over all subsets gives one -set lying inside or for more than of the pairs; adding it gives . After steps , so no pair survives and the chosen sets fail property B.
Read depth
Claims checked: the definition, Theorem 1, (2) and (6) were read clause by clause on the page images of the print, and the proof on p. 446 was followed. Refinement (6) is stated in the paper without proof and its calculation was not reconstructed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
None in the corpus. The lower bound in (2) is W. M. Schmidt's (Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 15 (1964), 373--374), cited, not proved, in the paper.
Source. P. Erdős, On a combinatorial problem. II, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 15 (1964), 445--447, doi:10.1007/BF01897152; the edition read is named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 901: here is the problem's function, the least number of edges of an -uniform hypergraph that is not 2-colorable. Theorem 1 gives the upper bound , the site's , and (6) states a constant-factor sharpening without proof; neither determines the order of , which the paper leaves open.