Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Published p. 262, Theorem 1.5, and Section 3, p. 272 (PDF). The source gives an outline; the branching inequality and both stopping cases are expanded here, including the fixed-level reduction needed for complements.

Statement. Fix 0<p<10<p<1 and η>0\eta>0. There is c>0c>0 such that families F,G⊆2[n]\mathcal F,\mathcal G\subseteq2^{[n]} avoiding an integer cross intersection ll satisfy

μp(F)μp(G)≤e−cn(1)\mu_p(\mathcal F)\mu_p(\mathcal G)\le e^{-cn} \tag{1}

whenever

max⁡(0,2p−1)+η≤l/n≤p−η.(2)\max(0,2p-1)+\eta\le l/n\le p-\eta. \tag{2}

Constants may be chosen uniformly for pp in a compact subset of (0,1)(0,1), with the same positive buffer η\eta. Thus this gives the source's two open parameter ranges for l=⌊ρn⌋l=\lfloor\rho n\rfloor, after decreasing the buffer and taking nn sufficiently large.

Proof. First suppose p≤1/2p\le1/2, and put t=p/(1−p)t=p/(1-p) and c0=1/tc_0=1/t. Apply the interval deletion algorithm of theorem_1_4, using weighted_deletion_inequality in place of its unweighted step. With fixed sufficiently small δ\delta, each growth step gains 1+δ1+\delta and each widening step retains bp,δ=1−c0δ−Op(δ2)b_{p,\delta}=1-c_0\delta-O_p(\delta^2). The interval invariant, termination, and positivity are unchanged.

Let u,vu,v be the two step counts and mm the final ambient size. Suppose the initial product is at least e−δ2ne^{-\delta^2n}. As in the unweighted proof, logarithms of the gains and the final upper bound one imply

u−c0v≤Cpδn,v≥p(n−m)−Cpδn.(3)u-c_0v\le C_p\delta n,\qquad v\ge p(n-m)-C_p\delta n. \tag{3}

Here and below the constants can be enlarged without changing the notation. The final product is at least e−Cp′δne^{-C'_p\delta n}. These estimates follow from Taylor bounds on a compact parameter interval; all constants are uniform when pp is bounded away from zero.

If the procedure stops at a=0a=0, its forbidden width is vv and u+v≥l≥ηnu+v\ge l\ge\eta n. Hence (3) gives v≥pηn/2v\ge p\eta n/2 for small enough δ\delta. All final cross intersections exceed vv. Theorem 3.1 and the entropy bound give a final product at most e−v2/m≤e−p2η2n/4e^{-v^2/m}\le e^{-p^2\eta^2n/4}, contradicting the lower bound when δ\delta is small. Zero ambient size is already impossible for positive families avoiding intersection zero.

If it stops at b=mb=m and a>0a>0, then m=b≤l≤(p−η)nm=b\le l\le(p-\eta)n. Using a=m−va=m-v and (3),

a≤(1+p)m−pn+Cpδn≤pm−ηn/2.(4)a\le(1+p)m-pn+C_p\delta n \le pm-\eta n/2. \tag{4}

Furthermore a>0a>0 in the first expression implies m≥pn/(2(1+p))m\ge p n/(2(1+p)) for sufficiently small δ\delta. All cross intersections are less than aa. Apply the biased small-intersection bound in product_measure_separation to the actual mm coordinates, with the fixed proportional gap supplied by (4). It gives an upper bound e−c1ne^{-c_1n}, where c1>0c_1>0 depends only on p,ηp,\eta. Taking Cp′δ<c1C'_p\delta<c_1 is a contradiction. This proves (1) for p≤1/2p\le1/2 and large nn.

Now let p>1/2p>1/2. Fix 0<τ<η/80<\tau<\eta/8. Under μp\mu_p, the total measure of sets whose size is outside [pn−τn,pn+τn][pn-\tau n,pn+\tau n] is at most 2e−2τ2n2e^{-2\tau^2n}, by the proved concentration estimate. If a family has measure at most twice this quantity, (1) already holds. Otherwise its typical-size part retains at least half its measure. Choose one size kk in that part of F\mathcal F, and one size hh in that part of G\mathcal G, each carrying at least 1/(n+1)1/(n+1) of its part's measure.

Complement these two uniform families. For their members,

∣Fc∩Gc∣=n−k−h+∣F∩G∣.|F^c\cap G^c|=n-k-h+|F\cap G|.

They therefore avoid l′=n−k−h+ll'=n-k-h+l. By (2) and ∣k−pn∣,∣h−pn∣≤τn|k-pn|,|h-pn|\le\tau n,

η/2≤l′/n≤(1−p)−η/2.\eta/2\le l'/n\le(1-p)-\eta/2.

Their μ1−p\mu_{1-p} measures equal the original level measures exactly. The already proved case at bias 1−p1-p bounds their product by e−c2ne^{-c_2n}. Since the original product is at most 4(n+1)24(n+1)^2 times that level product, it too has a fixed exponential gap. This proves the second range. Taking common compact bounds on pp and 1−p1-p proves the asserted uniformity.

For the finitely many remaining nn, each admissible ll is realized by the full cube and every point has positive product measure. Thus no avoiding pair has measure product one. There are finitely many pairs and integers ll; compactness of the allowed biases, or a smaller constant for a fixed bias, includes these cases. □\square

Precision. Complementation of arbitrary nonuniform families does not send a fixed intersection to a fixed intersection. The typical-level argument above supplies that missing step. The weighted widening factor has first-order loss (1−p)δ/p(1-p)\delta/p, not the unweighted loss δ\delta; its stopping estimate is correspondingly (3).

Dependencies. weighted_deletion_inequality, theorem_1_4, theorem_3_1, product_measure_separation, entropy_estimates.