Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (p. 161). Hypergraphs are finite, with no multiple edges and no isolated vertices; τ\tau and τ\tau-criticality are as on the Theorem 1 page. vmax⁡(r,t)v_{\max}(r,t) is the maximum of ∣V(H)∣|V(H)| over the rr-uniform τ\tau-critical hypergraphs HH with τ(H)=t\tau(H)=t.

Theorem 2 (p. 163, quoted). "vmax⁡(r,t)⩽(t+r−2r−2)t+tr−1v_{\max}(r,t)\leqslant\binom{t+r-2}{r-2}t+t^{r-1}."

On p. 161 the paper writes the right-hand side as (1+1(r−2)!)tr−1+O(tr−2)\left(1+\frac1{(r-2)!}\right)t^{r-1}+O(t^{r-2}), the expansion for fixed rr as t→∞t\to\infty.

Lower bound (Remark 1, p. 163). vmax⁡(r,t)≥(t+r−2r−1)+t+r−2v_{\max}(r,t)\ge\binom{t+r-2}{r-1}+t+r-2, shown by the hypergraph on disjoint sets XX and YY with ∣X∣=t+r−2|X|=t+r-2 and ∣Y∣=(t+r−2r−1)|Y|=\binom{t+r-2}{r-1}, whose edges are the (r−1)(r-1)-element subsets of XX, each with its own added vertex of YY. On p. 162 the paper records this as vmax⁡(r,t)≥tr−1/(r−1)!+O(tr−2)v_{\max}(r,t)\ge t^{r-1}/(r-1)!+O(t^{r-2}) and concludes that Theorem 2 gives the right order of magnitude of vmax⁡(r,t)v_{\max}(r,t) for fixed rr.

Extension (Proposition and the text after it, p. 164). A hypergraph is vertex-critical when each vertex lies in some τ(H)\tau(H)-element transversal. The Proposition states that HH is vertex-critical if and only if every τ\tau-critical partial hypergraph H′H' of HH with τ(H′)=τ(H)\tau(H')=\tau(H) has ∣V(H′)∣=∣V(H)∣|V(H')|=|V(H)|. Hence vmax⁡(r,t)v_{\max}(r,t) is also the largest order of a vertex-critical rr-uniform hypergraph with τ(H)=t\tau(H)=t, and Theorem 2 holds for vertex-critical hypergraphs. For r=2r=2 this gives Corollary 2 (p. 164), which the paper attributes to Erdős and Gallai: every vertex-critical graph GG has ∣V(G)∣≤2τ(G)|V(G)|\le2\tau(G). For r=3r=3 it gives Corollary 3.

Remark 2 (p. 165). For the arrow-symbol problems of Erdős, let m(r,t,k,u)m(r,t,k,u) be the largest order of an rr-uniform hypergraph HH with t−u≤τ(H)≤tt-u\le\tau(H)\le t in which every kk-element vertex set lies in some tt-element transversal. The paper notes that m(r,t,1,0)=vmax⁡(r,t)m(r,t,1,0)=v_{\max}(r,t), so Theorem 2 bounds m(r,t,1,0)m(r,t,1,0) by the same quantity.

Proof pointer

Pp. 163--164, in five steps. From the family of tt-element transversals of HH, members are removed to reach a subfamily T0T^0 in which every edge of HH still needs at least r−1r-1 of its vertices to meet all members, while dropping any one member lets some edge get by with r−2r-2. Choosing, for each edge, r−1r-1 of its vertices one at a time from members of T0T^0 gives an (r−1)(r-1)-uniform hypergraph H1H_1 with at most tr−1t^{r-1} edges. Each member ff of T0T^0 is paired with an (r−2)(r-2)-subset X(f)X(f) of an edge, with f∩X(f′)=∅f\cap X(f')=\varnothing exactly when f=f′f=f', so Bollobás's set-pairs inequality gives ∣E(T0)∣≤(t+r−2r−2)|E(T^0)|\le\binom{t+r-2}{r-2} and ∣V(H1)∣≤(t+r−2r−2)t|V(H_1)|\le\binom{t+r-2}{r-2}t. The vertices outside H1H_1 form a strongly stable set SS with Γ(S)⊆E(H1)\Gamma(S)\subseteq E(H_1), and Corollary 1 bounds ∣S∣|S| by ∣E(H1)∣|E(H_1)|.

Read depth

Claims checked: the definition of vmax⁡v_{\max}, the statement, Remark 1, the Proposition, Corollary 2 and Remark 2 were read on the print, and the proof was followed. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

  • Theorem 1, through Corollary 1 (p. 163).
  • Bollobás's set-pairs inequality (B. Bollobás, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 16 (1965); Lovász, Combinatorial Problems and Exercises, Ex. 32, p. 81).

Source. A. Gyárfás, J. Lehel and Zs. Tuza, Upper bound on the order of τ\tau-critical hypergraphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 33 (1982), no. 2, 161--165, doi:10.1016/0095-8956(82)90065-X, as identified on the source card: Theorem 2 and Remark 1 on p. 163.

Bears on

No problem page uses the theorem directly.