Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Setting (Section 4.1, p. 16). A SAT instance in which each clause contains at least kk variables and each variable occurs in at most LL clauses, either positively or negatively. (The summary in the introduction, p. 4, says each clause contains kk distinct variables.)

Theorem 4.1 (pp. 16 to 17). If each variable appears at most

L≤2k+1(1−1/k)kk−1−2kL\le\frac{2^{k+1}(1-1/k)^k}{k-1}-\frac2k

times, then the SAT instance is satisfiable, and the Moser-Tardos algorithm finds a satisfying assignment in polynomial time. If

L≤2k+1(1−1/k)k(k−1)(1+ϵ)−2k,L\le\frac{2^{k+1}(1-1/k)^k}{(k-1)(1+\epsilon)}-\frac2k,

then with high probability the parallel resampling algorithm finds a satisfying assignment in time (klog⁡n)O(1)/ϵ(k\log n)^{O(1)}/\epsilon.

The paper compares (p. 16) with the bound L≤2k+1/(e(k+1))L\le2^{k+1}/(e(k+1)) of Gebauer, Szabó and Tardos (SODA 2011), which it describes as asymptotically optimal up to first-order terms, and says (p. 4) that its bound is always better and that the improvement can be substantial for small kk.

Proof pointer

Section 4.1, p. 17, for the sequential statement; the paper says the parallel case is almost identical. Each clause gets the bad event that it is violated, with μ(B)=α\mu(B)=\alpha for all BB. A variable occurring in lil_i clauses, δili\delta_il_i of them positively, is set true with probability 1/2−x(δi−1/2)1/2-x(\delta_i-1/2), against the majority sign. The criterion, summed over assignable sets (Definition 2.11) as in Proposition 2.14, is reduced to the worst case δi=1/2\delta_i=1/2 by the choice x=αkL/(2α+2k+αkL)x=\alpha kL/(2\alpha+2k+\alpha kL), leaving the condition α≥2−k(1+α/k+αL/2)k\alpha\ge2^{-k}(1+\alpha/k+\alpha L/2)^k, which a suitable α≥0\alpha\ge0 meets under the stated bound on LL.

Read depth

Claims checked: the setting and Theorem 4.1 were read clause by clause on the print; the proof was followed for structure only. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Dependencies

Theorem 1.2 of the same paper, through Proposition 2.14, and Theorem 1.3 for the parallel part.

Source. D. G. Harris, Lopsidependency in the Moser-Tardos framework: beyond the lopsided Lovász local lemma, ACM Trans. Algorithms 13 (2017), no. 1, Art. 17, doi:10.1145/3015762; pages are those of arXiv:1610.02420v4, the edition named on the source card.

Bears on

No Erdős problem: the paper names none.