Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
The paper's definitions (Definitions 1.1 to 1.3, p. 2). An -graph is a hypergraph all of whose edges have size , identified with its edge set, so counts edges. For the neighbourhood is the -graph . For an -graph , an -decomposition of is a partition of into subgraphs isomorphic to , and is the complete -graph on vertices. An -graph is -divisible if divides for every -set and every . For an -graph on the density is , and is -typical if every set of -subsets of with satisfies .
Theorem 1.4 (p. 2). "For any there are and such that if is a -divisible -typical -graph on vertices, where and , then has a -decomposition."
The paper calls this a simplified form of its main theorem, Theorem 1.10. It notes (p. 2) that the parameters were not optimised, that the density of may decay polynomially in , and that the method gives a randomised algorithm for constructing designs. Applied with it gives the existence of Steiner systems for large under the divisibility conditions (the existence conjecture). The paper draws two further consequences on p. 2. For graphs (), the random graph with high probability has a partial triangle decomposition covering all but edges, which the paper calls the asymptotically best possible leave. And since an -graph with for every -set is -typical, a minimum -degree version of the theorem follows, generalising Gustavsson's minimum degree version of Wilson's theorem.
Proof pointer
Corollary 2.17 (p. 13) derives Theorem 1.4 from Theorem 1.10, choosing : by Lemma 2.16 (p. 13), which estimates the number of extensions in a typical -graph, the hypotheses of Theorem 1.4 imply that is -extendable and -regular with , where , and that for some ; these are the hypotheses of Theorem 1.10 with in place of .
Read depth
Claims checked: Definitions 1.1 to 1.3, Theorem 1.4 and the remarks after it on p. 2, and Lemma 2.16 and Corollary 2.17 on p. 13 were read clause by clause on the page images of the print. The proof of Theorem 1.10 was not checked. Nothing here is independently reviewed.
Dependencies
Theorem 1.10, through Corollary 2.17.
Source. P. Keevash, The existence of designs, arXiv:1401.3665; the edition read and its page numbers are named on the source card.
Bears on
- Problem 722: the paper applies the theorem with (p. 2) to conclude that, for fixed and large , the divisibility conditions suffice for a Steiner system with parameters , which is the problem's question with ; see the existence conjecture.