Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

For every three integers g≥3g\geq3, r≥2r\geq2, and m≥1m\geq1, there exists a finite 3-chromatic rr-uniform hypergraph G3(r,g,m)G_3(r,g,m) of girth at least gg such that

den⁡(G3(r,g,m))<1+1m,\operatorname{den}(G_3(r,g,m))<1+\frac1m,

where

den⁡(G)=max⁡∅≠H⊆G∣E(H)∣∣V(H)∣.\operatorname{den}(G)= \max_{\varnothing\ne H\subseteq G}\frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|}.

Source. A. V. Kostochka and J. Nešetřil, Properties of Descartes' Construction of Triangle-Free Graphs with High Chromatic Number, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 8(5) (1999), 467–472, read in the institutional preprint described on the source card: Property 7 is stated on logical p. 5 for "positive integers g≥3g\geq3, r≥2r\geq2 and mm", with its proof on pp. 5–6. The construction and Properties 1′1', 2′2', 3′3', and 5′5' used in the proof appear on pp. 4–5, and the density is defined on p. 3.

Rewritten proof

Use the hypergraph replacement construction. For fixed rr and gg, its first stage G2(r,g)G_2(r,g) is one rr-edge, so

den⁡(G2(r,g))=1r.\operatorname{den}(G_2(r,g))=\frac1r.

Construct G3(r,g)G_3(r,g) by one replacement step. Properties 1′1', 2′2', and 3′3' give χ(G3(r,g))=3\chi(G_3(r,g))=3 and girth at least gg, while Property 5′5' gives

den⁡(G3(r,g))<1+1r≤1+12.\operatorname{den}(G_3(r,g)) <1+\frac1r\leq1+\frac12.

Thus this one hypergraph proves the assertion for m=1m=1 and m=2m=2.

We now give the density-improving step. Suppose the assertion has been proved for every positive integer m≤m0m\leq m_0, every uniformity at least 22, and every g≥3g\geq3, where m0≥2m_0\geq2. Put

R=r(r−1).R=r(r-1).

The induction hypothesis supplies a 3-chromatic RR-uniform hypergraph

F=G3(R,g,m0)F=G_3(R,g,m_0)

of girth at least gg and density less than 1+1/m01+1/m_0. Apply the replacement construction to the single edge G2(r,g)G_2(r,g) using this FF as the auxiliary hypergraph. The uniformity is correct because the construction requires an (r−1)∣V(G2)∣=r(r−1)=R(r-1)|V(G_2)|=r(r-1)=R uniform auxiliary hypergraph. Call the resulting rr-uniform hypergraph GG. Again Properties 1′1', 2′2', and 3′3' give χ(G)=3\chi(G)=3 and girth at least gg.

We claim that

den⁡(G)<1+12m0.\operatorname{den}(G)<1+\frac1{2m_0}.

Suppose otherwise. Choose, with as few vertices as possible, a nonempty subhypergraph H⊆GH\subseteq G satisfying

∣E(H)∣∣V(H)∣≥1+12m0>1.\frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|}\geq1+\frac1{2m_0}>1.

No vertex of HH has degree zero or one. Indeed, deleting a vertex of degree d≤1d\leq1 and its incident edges gives a smaller subhypergraph, and if e=∣E(H)∣e=|E(H)| and v=∣V(H)∣v=|V(H)|, then e>ve>v and

e−dv−1≥e−1v−1>ev.\frac{e-d}{v-1}\geq\frac{e-1}{v-1}>\frac ev.

This contradicts the minimal choice of HH.

For each edge f∈E(F)f\in E(F), the construction has one associated copy of G2G_2: an old edge on rr noncentral vertices, together with the rr replacement edges joining those vertices to a partition of ff. Call these r+1r+1 edges a block. Every noncentral vertex of GG has degree exactly two, one in the old edge and one in its replacement edge. If HH contains one noncentral vertex of a block, its minimum degree forces both of those edges into HH. The old edge then puts all rr noncentral vertices of that block in HH, and their minimum degree in turn forces all rr replacement edges into HH. Therefore the edges of HH are partitioned into complete blocks.

Let xx be the number of these blocks and let yy be the number of central vertices in HH. The xx corresponding edges of FF, on these yy vertices, form a subhypergraph of FF. Hence

xy≤den⁡(F)<1+1m0,soyx>m0m0+1.\frac{x}{y}\leq\operatorname{den}(F)<1+\frac1{m_0}, \qquad\text{so}\qquad \frac yx>\frac{m_0}{m_0+1}.

Each block contributes r+1r+1 edges and rr noncentral vertices. It follows that

∣E(H)∣∣V(H)∣=x(r+1)rx+y=r+1r+y/x<r+1r+m0/(m0+1)=1+1r+(r+1)m0<1+1rm0≤1+12m0.\begin{aligned} \frac{|E(H)|}{|V(H)|} &=\frac{x(r+1)}{rx+y} =\frac{r+1}{r+y/x}\\ &<\frac{r+1}{r+m_0/(m_0+1)} =1+\frac1{r+(r+1)m_0}\\ &<1+\frac1{r m_0} \leq1+\frac1{2m_0}. \end{aligned}

This contradicts the defining inequality for HH and proves the claim.

The same GG is a witness for every integer mm with m0<m≤2m0m_0<m\leq2m_0, since

1+12m0≤1+1m.1+\frac1{2m_0}\leq1+\frac1m.

Starting with the verified range 1≤m≤21\leq m\leq2 and repeatedly doubling the upper endpoint covers every positive integer mm. This completes the induction.

The source begins the minimal-density contradiction with a strict inequality. The rewritten proof uses ≥\geq so that the claimed strict density bound also excludes equality; the same deletion and block argument applies because the threshold is strictly greater than 11.

Consequence for Problem 1022

Fix t≥2t\geq2 and a real number c>1c>1. Choose an integer m≥1m\geq1 with

1+1m<c1+\frac1m<c

and apply Property 7 with r=tr=t and any g≥3g\geq3. For every nonempty vertex set X⊆V(G3)X\subseteq V(G_3), the induced hypergraph G3[X]G_3[X] is a subhypergraph, so

∣E(G3[X])∣∣X∣≤den⁡(G3)<1+1m<c.\frac{|E(G_3[X])|}{|X|} \leq\operatorname{den}(G_3) <1+\frac1m<c.

Thus the family of tt-edges of G3G_3 satisfies the strict sparsity hypothesis in Problem 1022, but χ(G3)=3\chi(G_3)=3, so it does not have property B. No c>1c>1 can satisfy the proposed implication, for any t≥2t\geq2. Consequently every valid constant would have to satisfy c≤1c\leq1, and in particular no sequence of valid constants can tend to infinity.

The paper also reports (p. 5) that Burstein, Lovász, Seymour, and Woodall independently proved that every 3-chromatic hypergraph has density at least 11. The corpus records the Lovász proof from the primary source. In Lovász's terminology, a hypergraph is a forest when every nonempty subsystem has at least one more vertex than edge, and his 1968 Theorem 5 proves that every forest is two-colorable. By contraposition, a hypergraph that is not two-colorable has a subsystem with at least as many edges as vertices, which is the reported density bound.

For Problem 1022, the strict c=1c=1 counting condition makes the family a forest: apply the condition to the union of any nonempty subfamily. Lovász's theorem therefore proves that c=1c=1 works, while Property 7 above rules out every c>1c>1. The largest valid constant is consequently exactly 11 for every t≥2t\geq2. The union-of-edges formulation and its explicit pointer back to the 1968 proof are recorded in Lovász's 1973 Theorem 3.

Dependency

[[set_systems/kostochka_1999_properties_descartes_construction_triangle_free_graphs/hypergraph_construction|The hypergraph replacement construction and Properties 1′1', 2′2', 3′3', and 5′5']].

Bears on

  • Problem 1022: with r=tr=t and 1+1/m<c1+1/m<c, the hypergraph meets the corrected statement's counting condition (every nonempty XX) with constant cc and has no property B, for every t≥2t\geq2 and c>1c>1.