Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Statement

Notation as on the definitions page. A tree here is a graph without circuits (p. 373).

Theorem 9 (p. 373, quoted). "Let γ≥ω\gamma\ge\omega. The graph G\mathcal G has an edge-decomposition onto the union of γ\gamma trees if and only if Col(G)≤γ+\mathrm{Col}(\mathcal G)\le\gamma^+."

So, for infinite γ\gamma, G\mathcal G is a union of γ\gamma trees exactly when its vertices can be well-ordered so that each vertex has at most γ\gamma neighbours before it. The paper recalls (p. 373) that Nash-Williams gave the corresponding condition for finite γ\gamma: every finite subgraph on ii vertices has at most (i−1)γ(i-1)\gamma edges.

Lemma 8 (p. 374). If G\mathcal G has an edge-decomposition Gξ\mathcal G_\xi, ξ<γ\xi<\gamma, of type γ\gamma with Col(Gξ)≤γ+\mathrm{Col}(\mathcal G_\xi)\le\gamma^+ for every ξ<γ\xi<\gamma, then Col(G)≤γ+\mathrm{Col}(\mathcal G)\le\gamma^+.

Source. P. Erdős and A. Hajnal, On decomposition of graphs, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 18 (1967), 359--377, doi:10.1007/BF02280296; the edition read is named on the source card.

Read depth. Claims checked: Definition 6.1, Theorem 9, Lemma 8 and their proofs (pp. 373--374) were read clause by clause on the page images. The proof of Lemma 8 cites Theorem 6.3 of the authors' 1966 paper, which was not read. Nothing here is independently reviewed.

Proof pointer

P. 374. If Col(G)≤γ+\mathrm{Col}(\mathcal G)\le\gamma^+, fix a well-ordering in which every vertex has at most γ\gamma earlier neighbours and send the edges from a vertex back to its earlier neighbours into distinct members; no member then has a circuit, since in a circuit the latest vertex would have two edges back in one member. Conversely a tree has colouring number 22, and Lemma 8 combines the γ\gamma members. Lemma 8 is proved through the set mapping f(x)f(x) of all neighbours that precede xx in some member's well-ordering, which has order at most γ+\gamma^+, and Theorem 6.3 of the authors' earlier paper.

Dependencies

Lemma 8 of the same paper; Theorem 6.3 of Erdős and Hajnal, On chromatic number of graphs and set-systems, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 17 (1966), 61--99 (the paper's reference [1]).

Bears on