Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Statement
Conjecture 4, as posed on p. 167:
Let be an infinite sequence of positive integers such that . Can the set of rationals for which
is solvable for some contain all the rationals in some interval . [sic] We conjecture not.
The paper adds (p. 167): "If this conjecture is true then according to Graham [5] this is best possible." Its reference [5] (p. 168) is R. L. Graham, On finite sums of unit fractions, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 14 (1964), 193--207, which was not read for this card; it has its own card, graham_1964_finite_sums_unit_fractions.
Source. M. N. Bleicher and P. Erdős, Denominators of Egyptian fractions, J. Number Theory 8 (1976), 157--168; Conjecture 4 on printed p. 167 (PDF p. 11), the last of the four conjectures of Section IV, "Some Conjectures"; the bibliography on p. 168 (PDF p. 12). The copy read is a scan whose text layer garbles formulas; read on the page images.
Read depth. Claims checked: the statement was read clause by clause on the page image. It is a conjecture; there is no proof to check in this paper.
Dependencies
None.
Bears on
- Problem 355: the problem asks whether a lacunary sequence exists whose finite distinct-reciprocal sums represent every rational in some interval, which is the negation of this conjecture; the problem page records the status and the source that settles it (the 2025 paper filed as doorn_2025_lacunary_sequences_whose_reciprocal_sums_represent).