Notation and statement
Write R(A)=∑n∈A1/n,
Aq={n∈A:q∣n, gcd(q,n/q)=1},
QA={q=pa:Aq=∅} and
R(A;q)=∑n∈Aqq/n. Thus Aq uses the exact prime power
in n, not every prime power divisor.
For sufficiently large N and A⊆[1,N]∩N, there
is B⊆A such that
R(B)≥R(A)−(logN)−1/200,R(B;q)≥2(logN)−1/100(q∈QB).
Source. Bloom, arXiv:2112.03726v2, Lemma 6, p. 17.
Rewritten proof
Start with A0=A. If qi∈QAi has
R(Ai;qi)<2(logN)−1/100, delete the entire fiber:
Ai+1=Ai∖(Ai)qi. Otherwise stop. A deletion removes
at least one element, so the process stops at some B satisfying the
required fiber inequalities.
The loss at step i is R(Ai;qi)/qi, less than
2/[qi(logN)1/100]. No qi can recur: after deletion no
remaining integer has that exact prime power, and subsequent steps only
remove integers. Every such qi is at most N. Consequently
R(A)−R(B)≤2(logN)−1/100q≤N∑q1≪(logN)−1/100loglogN≤(logN)−1/200
for all sufficiently large N.
Dependencies
The external Mertens prime-power estimate
∑q≤x1/q=loglogx+c+O(1/logx), equation (1), p. 3.
The proof refines the pruning approach of Croot's Proposition 2.
Bears on