Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Fix 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<1 and δ>0\delta>0. Let qq be a sufficiently large integer and let

I⊆[qε,2qε]∩Z,(i,q)=1,∣I∣≥δqε.I\subseteq[q^\varepsilon,2q^\varepsilon]\cap\mathbb Z,\qquad (i,q)=1,\qquad |I|\ge\delta q^\varepsilon.

Let VV be the centered representatives of the inverses of II modulo qq. There are constants c>0c>0 and d≥1d\ge1 depending only on ε,δ\varepsilon,\delta, a real s≍qε/2s\asymp q^{\varepsilon/2} with s≤qε/2s\le q^{\varepsilon/2} and integer λ=cs≥8\lambda=cs\ge8, and:

  • a retained set J⊆VJ\subseteq V, ∣J∣≥∣I∣/4|J|\ge|I|/4;
  • a witness B0⊆JB_0\subseteq J, ∣B0∣≤s|B_0|\le s;
  • a symmetric progression P∗={∑i=1kuidi:∣ui∣≤ai, ui∈Z}P_*=\{\sum_{i=1}^k u_i d_i:|u_i|\le a_i,\ u_i\in\mathbb Z\}, where 1≤k≤d1\le k\le d and the aia_i are positive integers;

such that J⊆P∗J\subseteq P_*, a translate of (λ/4)P∗(\lambda/4)P_* is proper and lies in Σ(B0)\Sigma(B_0), and, writing A=∏iaiA=\prod_i a_i,

A≤2(4/c)kq s1−k.(1)A\le 2(4/c)^k q\,s^{1-k}. \tag{1}

For real dilates, the coordinate bounds are rounded down. In particular, when k≥2k\ge2, (1) gives A<qA<q for sufficiently large qq. The retained set JJ and the witness B0B_0 have distinct roles. The external theorem supplies B0⊆JB_0\subseteq J, though the argument below only needs the weaker consequence B0⊆VB_0\subseteq V.

Source: published PDF, pp. 7–8. This expands and repairs the positive-input, symmetrization, properness, and volume steps needed to use the exact external CFP interface.

Bears on. Problem 297.

Proof

For large qq, 2qε<q/22q^\varepsilon<q/2, so the elements of II have distinct residues. Inversion preserves distinctness. No member of VV is zero. At least half of VV is positive or at least half is negative. Reflect the latter half if necessary, obtaining a set A0⊆[⌊q/2⌋]A_0\subseteq[\lfloor q/2\rfloor] of size m≥∣I∣/2≥δqε/2m\ge |I|/2\ge\delta q^\varepsilon/2, and a sign σ∈{1,−1}\sigma\in\{1,-1\}.

Apply Theorem 3 with β=2/ε+2\beta=2/\varepsilon+2 and η=1/4\eta=1/4. Indeed ⌊q/2⌋≤mβ\lfloor q/2\rfloor\le m^\beta for large qq. Let c,dc,d be its constants and choose

λ=⌊cqε/2⌋,s=λ/c.\lambda=\lfloor c q^{\varepsilon/2}\rfloor,\qquad s=\lambda/c.

Then s≍qε/2s\asymp q^{\varepsilon/2}, s≤qε/2s\le q^{\varepsilon/2}, and mη≤s≤cm/log⁡mm^\eta\le s\le cm/\log m eventually. This real value of ss is permitted in the external statement, and makes its dilation cs=λcs=\lambda an integer. The retained set loses at most c−1slog⁡m=o(m)c^{-1}s\log m=o(m), so has size at least m/2≥∣I∣/4m/2\ge|I|/4. Reflect the output back by σ\sigma. It gives JJ, B0B_0 and a progression PP with J∪{0}⊆PJ\cup\{0\}\subseteq P such that a translate of λP\lambda P lies in Σ(B0)\Sigma(B_0) and λP\lambda P is proper.

Write the coordinate map of PP as an affine integer map on an integer box, and choose the coordinate preimage of 0. Recenter at that preimage. There are nonnegative integers ui,viu_i,v_i such that

P={∑ixidi:−ui≤xi≤vi}.P=\left\{\sum_i x_i d_i:-u_i\le x_i\le v_i\right\}.

Here the affine constant has vanished exactly. Delete any coordinate of zero width. Put ai=max⁡(ui,vi)≥1a_i=\max(u_i,v_i)\ge1, giving P⊆P∗P\subseteq P_*. At least one coordinate remains, since JJ contains a unit and is nonempty. Because λ\lambda is an integer, this recentering represents the same λ\lambda-fold sum progression on the box [−λui,λvi][-\lambda u_i,\lambda v_i].

Set hi=⌊λai/4⌋h_i=\lfloor\lambda a_i/4\rfloor and bi=−λui+hib_i=-\lambda u_i+h_i. Then

bi+[−hi,hi]⊆[−λui,λvi],b_i+[-h_i,h_i]\subseteq[-\lambda u_i,\lambda v_i],

since 2hi≤λai/2≤λ(ui+vi)2h_i\le\lambda a_i/2\le\lambda(u_i+v_i). Thus the image of the smaller box, which is a translate of (λ/4)P∗(\lambda/4)P_*, lies in λP\lambda P. It is proper because the enclosing coordinate map is injective. The unshifted coordinate box of this smaller progression contains the box defining P∗P_*, since λ/4≥1\lambda/4\ge1, so P∗P_* itself is proper.

The reduced progression has ∏i(2hi+1)≥(λ/4)kA\prod_i(2h_i+1)\ge(\lambda/4)^k A points: 2⌊z⌋+1≥z2\lfloor z\rfloor+1\ge z for z≥1z\ge1. All subset sums of B0B_0 lie between −sq/2-sq/2 and sq/2sq/2, so their number is at most sq+1≤2sqsq+1\le2sq. Comparison proves (1). As s≍qε/2s\asymp q^{\varepsilon/2} and kk ranges over the fixed finite set {2,…,d}\{2,\ldots,d\}, its right side is less than qq eventually for every such kk.