Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Theorem 1, printed p. 435 (PDF p. 1) of R. L. Graham, A theorem on partitions, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 3 (1963), no. 4, 435--441, DOI 10.1017/S1446788700039045; the Remarks on printed p. 441 (PDF p. 7). The copy read is an image-only scan; the statement and the Remarks were read on the rendered page images.

Statement

Theorem 1 (p. 435). Every integer n>77n>77 admits positive integers k,a1,…,akk,a_1,\ldots,a_k satisfying the three conditions

  1. 1<a1<a2<⋯<ak1<a_1<a_2<\cdots<a_k;
  2. n=a1+a2+⋯+akn=a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_k;
  3. 1=a1−1+a2−1+⋯+ak−11=a_1^{-1}+a_2^{-1}+\cdots+a_k^{-1}.

The Remarks (p. 441) add that the threshold is exact: "in some recent unpublished work of D. H. Lehmer, it has been shown that we must have r(1,1)≥77r(1,1)\ge77, i.e., 7777 cannot be partitioned into distinct positive integers whose reciprocals sum to 11." The same Remarks state the polynomial conjecture 2′2', whose case α=β=1\alpha=\beta=1 is the question of Problem 283 (see the card).

Proof pointer and sketch

The proof (pp. 435--437) is a table of explicit representations for every nn from 7878 to 167167 and the odd nn from 169169 to 333333 (the entry n:a1,…,akn:a_1,\ldots,a_k means ∑ai=n\sum a_i=n and ∑1/ai=1\sum1/a_i=1; the table begins 78:2,6,8,10,12,4078:2,6,8,10,12,40) followed by two transformations of a representation 1=∑1/di1=\sum1/d_i with denominator sum UU: 1=12+∑12di1=\frac12+\sum\frac1{2d_i} has denominator sum 2U+22U+2, and 1=13+17+178+191+∑12di1=\frac13+\frac17+\frac1{78}+\frac1{91}+\sum\frac1{2d_i} has denominator sum 2U+1792U+179; all denominators remain distinct provided no did_i equals 11 or 3939. The first transformation fills in the even nn from 168168 to 334334, and induction then covers every n>77n>77. The table was not rechecked here and the proof was read for structure only.

Dependencies and read depth

Self-contained apart from the table. Read depth: claims checked (the statement on the page image of p. 435 and the Remarks on p. 441 were read clause by clause); the proof is not verified here.

Bears on

  • Problem 283: the case p(x)=xp(x)=x of the problem's statement, with the explicit threshold 7777 (the site's "Graham [Gr63] has proved this when p(x)=xp(x)=x").
  • Problem 351: the case p(x)=xp(x)=x without the removal of a finite set. A representation n=∑ain=\sum a_i with ∑1/ai=1\sum1/a_i=1 gives n+1=∑(ai+1/ai)n+1=\sum(a_i+1/a_i), so every integer m≥79m\ge79 is a finite sum of distinct terms of {n+1/n}\{n+1/n\}; the strong completeness the problem asks for (any finite set removed) is Theorem 2 of the same paper, or Theorem 3 with α=1\alpha=1, and the polynomial case is not treated here.