Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Source. Liu--Sawhney, On further questions regarding unit fractions, arXiv:2404.07113v1, Lemma 2.3, pp. 7--8; see the source digest.

Statement. Take NN sufficiently large and 2≤t≤N1/42\leq t\leq N^{1/4}, and let YY consist of the positive integers having at least one prime-power divisor q>N/tq>N/t. Then

∣Y∩[1,N]∣≤2Nlog⁡tlog⁡N.|Y\cap[1,N]|\leq\frac{2N\log t}{\log N}.

Proof. The union bound over prime powers gives

∣Y∩[1,N]∣≤N∑N/t<q≤N1q.|Y\cap[1,N]|\leq N\sum_{N/t<q\leq N}\frac1q.

Put u=N/t≥N3/4u=N/t\geq N^{3/4}. There are O(N1/2+N1/3log⁡N)=O(N1/2)O(N^{1/2}+N^{1/3}\log N)=O(N^{1/2}) proper prime powers pa≤Np^a\leq N with a≥2a\geq2: count squares first and then use p≤N1/3p\leq N^{1/3} and a≤log⁡2Na\leq\log_2N for the remaining powers. Each of the powers exceeding uu contributes at most 1/u1/u, so their contribution after multiplication by NN is O(N3/4)O(N^{3/4}). For the primes, Theorem 2.1 therefore gives, uniformly in tt,

∣Y∩[1,N]∣≤Nlog⁡ ⁣(log⁡Nlog⁡(N/t))+O ⁣(N(log⁡N)2).|Y\cap[1,N]| \leq N\log\!\left(\frac{\log N}{\log(N/t)}\right) +O\!\left(\frac{N}{(\log N)^2}\right).

Writing a=log⁡t/log⁡Na=\log t/\log N, we have log⁡2/log⁡N≤a≤1/4\log2/\log N\leq a\leq1/4. Hence

11−a≤1+43a.\frac1{1-a}\leq1+\frac43a.

The difference between log⁡(1+3a/2)\log(1+3a/2) and log⁡(1+4a/3)\log(1+4a/3) is bounded below by an absolute positive constant times aa on this range. Since a≥log⁡2/log⁡Na\geq\log2/\log N, this absorbs the preceding O((log⁡N)−2)O((\log N)^{-2}) error for sufficiently large NN. Thus

∣Y∩[1,N]∣≤Nlog⁡(1+3a/2)≤32Na≤2Na,|Y\cap[1,N]| \leq N\log(1+3a/2) \leq\frac32Na\leq2Na,

as required. This expands the source's error absorption and its dismissal of proper prime powers.

Source notation corrections. The first sum in the printed proof has lower limit t≤qt\leq q, whereas the set in the statement requires N/t<qN/t<q. That line also writes ∣Y∣|Y| although YY itself is infinite; the quantity being bounded throughout is ∣Y∩[1,N]∣|Y\cap[1,N]|. The proof above uses the limits and finite intersection specified by the statement.

Dependencies. Theorem 2.1 and elementary divisor counting.

Bears on. #298 and #299, through smooth-denominator reductions in the quantitative reciprocal-sum criterion.