Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Source. Liu--Sawhney, On further questions regarding unit fractions, arXiv:2404.07113v1, Lemma 2.3, pp. 7--8; see the source digest.
Statement. Take sufficiently large and , and let consist of the positive integers having at least one prime-power divisor . Then
Proof. The union bound over prime powers gives
Put . There are proper prime powers with : count squares first and then use and for the remaining powers. Each of the powers exceeding contributes at most , so their contribution after multiplication by is . For the primes, Theorem 2.1 therefore gives, uniformly in ,
Writing , we have . Hence
The difference between and is bounded below by an absolute positive constant times on this range. Since , this absorbs the preceding error for sufficiently large . Thus
as required. This expands the source's error absorption and its dismissal of proper prime powers.
Source notation corrections. The first sum in the printed proof has lower limit , whereas the set in the statement requires . That line also writes although itself is infinite; the quantity being bounded throughout is . The proof above uses the limits and finite intersection specified by the statement.
Dependencies. Theorem 2.1 and elementary divisor counting.
Bears on. #298 and #299, through smooth-denominator reductions in the quantitative reciprocal-sum criterion.