Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. For a Sidon set A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb{N} of size nn let I(A)I(A) be the number of s∈A+As\in A+A with s−1,s+1∉A+As-1,s+1\notin A+A. Then

16 I(A)+100n+16≥n2,16\,I(A)+100n+16\geq n^2,

so the minimum f(n)f(n) of I(A)I(A) over Sidon sets of size nn satisfies f(n)≥(n2−100n−16)/16f(n)\geq(n^2-100n-16)/16. In particular f(n)→∞f(n)\to\infty, which answers the question yes, and f(n)≫n2f(n)\gg n^2, the strengthening the site's remarks ask about.

Argument. As the thread summarizes it: for X⊆ZX\subseteq\mathbb{Z} write Nk(X)N_k(X) for the number of x∈Xx\in X with x+k∈Xx+k\in X and V2(X)V_2(X) for the number with both neighbors in XX. Three counting facts hold for every finite XX: I(X)+2N1(X)=∣X∣+V2(X)I(X)+2N_1(X)=\lvert X\rvert+V_2(X); 4N1(X)+N3(X)≤3∣X∣+2N2(X)4N_1(X)+N_3(X)\leq3\lvert X\rvert+2N_2(X), a pointwise inequality of indicator values summed over XX; and 2N2(X)≤N3(X)+2V2(X)+2I(X)2N_2(X)\leq N_3(X)+2V_2(X)+2I(X). For k=1,2,3k=1,2,3 the quadruples (a,b,c,d)∈A4(a,b,c,d)\in A^4 with a+b+k=c+da+b+k=c+d are compared with NkN_k of the difference set D=A−AD=A-A and of the sumset S=A+AS=A+A: the Sidon property gives at most Nk(D)+2nN_k(D)+2n quadruples, and each counted element of SS other than a double 2a2a yields at least four, so 4Nk(S)4N_k(S) is at most the number of quadruples plus 8n8n. Applying the indicator inequality to DD and transferring to SS, the N1N_1, N3N_3 and V2V_2 terms cancel and leave 16 I(S)+100n≥8∣S∣−3∣D∣16\,I(S)+100n\geq8\lvert S\rvert-3\lvert D\rvert; with ∣S∣≥n2/2\lvert S\rvert\geq n^2/2, ∣D∣≤n2\lvert D\rvert\leq n^2 and a boundary correction of 1616 at zero this is the claim.

Formalization. The proof is a Lean 4 development by the DeepMind prover agent in a fork of formal-conjectures, posted to the thread by GTsoukalas on 2026-04-03: the first pinned commit of 2026-04-02 proves erdos_152, the limit statement, and the second commit of that day proves the quadratic variant erdos_152.variants.square, which the poster says was formalized by hand from the same argument. formal-conjectures (the record link,) tags both statements research solved and cites these two commits as their formal proofs. A further Lean development, the file Erdos152.lean of Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (the third formalization link, added 2026-08-16), declares itself a formalization of a solution to Problem 152, listing the DeepMind prover agent among its informal authors with Erdős, Sárközy and Sós, and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors; it proves erdos_152_unbounded, that f(n)→∞f(n)\to\infty, and erdos_152, that n2≤64 f(n)n^2\leq64\,f(n) for all large nn.

Acceptance. Reviewed: Thomas Bloom, the site's curator, states in the thread on 2026-05-16 that the problem is solved by this proof, which has been formalized, and the remarks credit DeepMind with the stronger ≫∣A∣2\gg\lvert A\rvert^2 bound; the page is labeled proved (last edited 2026-05-17; accessed 2026-10-07). Bloom's remark of 2026-04-03 that the methods of Erdős, Sárközy and Sós already give the result was withdrawn by Bloom on 2026-05-16, leaving this the only proof known. The corpus has built none of the Lean developments and has not audited the agreement of their statements with the site's formulation.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki.