Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Saxton and Thomason prove that the number of Sidon subsets of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} lies between 2(1.16+o(1))N1/22^{(1.16+o(1))N^{1/2}} and 2(55+o(1))N1/22^{(55+o(1))N^{1/2}} (Theorem 2.11 of the Inventiones paper, whose proof is written out as Theorem 1.10 and Section 5 of the companion paper in J. Combin. Theory Ser. B). The lower bound is a construction: a modular Sidon set SS of size about N1/2/2N^{1/2}/2 and its four shifts by multiples of the modulus; assigning each element of SS to one of the four shifts or to none keeps the union Sidon, giving about 5N1/2/25^{N^{1/2}/2} distinct Sidon sets, and log⁡25/2=1.16…\log_2 5/2 = 1.16\ldots. The upper bound is a direct application of their container theorem.

The deduction to the problem is short; it was posted in the forum on 2025-11-23 and the site's remarks record it. Every Sidon set lies in a maximal one, and a maximal Sidon subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} has at most (1+o(1))N1/2(1+o(1))N^{1/2} elements by the Erdős–Turán bound, so it contains at most 2(1+o(1))N1/22^{(1+o(1))N^{1/2}} Sidon sets. Hence

A1(N)≥2(0.16+o(1))N1/2.A_1(N) \geq 2^{(0.16+o(1))N^{1/2}}.

This answers the first question no (A1(N)A_1(N) is not 2o(N1/2)2^{o(N^{1/2})}) and the second question yes (any c<1/2c<1/2 works), which is why the claim is answered rather than proved or disproved.

Acceptance. The counting theorem is refereed: Invent. Math. 201 (2015), 925–992, with the Sidon proof in J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 121 (2016), 248–283. The deduction to the two questions is recorded by the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, who labels the problem solved and states the lower bound on A1(N)A_1(N) in the problem's remarks (page last edited 2025-12-28), after a forum comment of 2025-11-23 pointed the deduction out; that is the reviewed evidence. The source card is saxton_2015_hypergraph_containers.

Formalization. The site's label carries a Lean qualifier. A Lean 4 proof of the conclusion (Lean v4.24.0), produced automatically by Aristotle (from Harmonic) from a proof of ChatGPT's choice, with the theorem statement written by Aristotle, and posted on 2026-01-21, proves that log⁡A1(N)/N1/2\log A_1(N)/N^{1/2} is eventually at least cc for every c<12log⁡(5/4)c<\tfrac12\log(5/4), equivalently A1(N)≥2(0.16+o(1))N1/2A_1(N)\geq 2^{(0.16+o(1))N^{1/2}} since log⁡25/4=0.160…\log_2\sqrt{5/4}=0.160\ldots, together with the two corollaries, which the file proves without assuming f(N)∼Nf(N)\sim\sqrt N for the largest size f(N)f(N) of a Sidon subset of {1,…,N}\{1,\ldots,N\} (log⁡A1(N)\log A_1(N) is not o(N1/2)o(N^{1/2}), and A1(N)≥2NcA_1(N)\geq 2^{N^c} eventually for every 0<c<1/20<c<1/2), with one added axiom asserting a prime between xx and (1+ε)x(1+\varepsilon)x for all large xx, a consequence of the prime number theorem; its axiom closure is that axiom and the three standard ones. A later revision of the file, kept in the repository's src/v4.29.1 folder (the commit of 2026-06-24 that gave the folder its name) with Boris Alexeev and Kevin Barreto as formal authors and ChatGPT among the informal authors, discharges the prime-gap axiom through the PrimeNumberTheoremAnd project it imports; its closing #print axioms comment records only propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound for erdos_862, and the formal-conjectures statement file records it as the problem's formal proof. This corpus has built or audited neither revision, so the formalization is a link here and not acceptance evidence.

Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result rests on the refereed counting theorem and the Erdős–Turán bound on the size of a Sidon set.