Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. R. Shi and Y. Dong, An improved upper bound for colorings without symmetrically colored -term arithmetic progressions, arXiv:2607.20752 (v1 22 July 2026, v2 28 July 2026, 7 pages), state the following. Call a nontrivial -term progression symmetrically colored by , for even , when for every . For every even and every prime there is a coloring of with colors and no symmetrically colored -term progression, hence a coloring of with colors; for this lowers the exponent of Deng, Tidor and Zhao's -coloring to . The construction combines a carry-controlling coloring of the base- digits with a layered norm map from the extension of and a linear term. Taking the product with Behrend-style colorings, the paper claims
for the function of Problem 160. The abstract also claims for every , toward a question of Ruzsa, and that the -progression result disproves a conjectured lower bound of Gowers for all even ; neither bears on Problem 160. The site's proof claim, posted by the account ruizshi on 2026-07-24 and credited to GPT 5.6 Sol, says that the question stays open and names the preprint; its one comment, of the same day, outlines the construction. This account follows the arXiv abstract and the claim thread.
Submission note. Posted to erdosproblems.com as a proof claim by Ruizhe Shi, Yiqi Dong (account ruizshi) on 24 July 2026, giving "GPT 5.6 Sol" as the AI used:
We are not able to prove the result. But this new result (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.20752) can improve the exponent in the upper bound from to . The approach is to give a new construction for the coloring problem introduced in https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.06914. And the basic idea is to use the standard norm plus a linear term to color . Then we can take a product of such a coloring with the Behrend-style coloring as previous comment suggested.
Covers. An upper bound only: , the smallest exponent claimed for the problem. It gives no lower bound and does not determine the order of ; whether remains open, as the claim itself says. The earlier claim of [[problems/additive_combinatorics/E0160/claims/2026_07_14_itabe|Itabe's bound ]] is weaker, and the preprint's authors say on its thread that a future version will cite it.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki: the construction is self-contained as the abstract describes it, and the Behrend-style product step is the known reduction from symmetric colorings.
Standing. Claimed. The preprint is unrefereed, with no journal record found; the site's label is OPEN and its page, last edited 2 December 2025, does not mention the claim, so the curator records no acceptance. No review of the argument is known here.