Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. There is an absolute constant such that for every finite set of size ,
Littlewood's conjecture and the exact question of Problem 512. It is the theorem of O. C. McGehee, L. Pigno and B. Smith, Hardy's inequality and the norm of exponential sums, Ann. of Math. (2) 113 (1981), no. 3, 613–618, announced in Hardy's inequality and the Littlewood conjecture, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 5 (1981), no. 1, 71–72. Neither paper is held by the library, and the statement is recorded at the level the site's problem page gives it; the method's name, a Hardy-type inequality and a dual construction, is taken from the titles and from the Lean file below.
Acceptance. The Annals paper is a refereed journal publication, the
refereed evidence; the publisher's record dates the issue to May 1981 and
gives no day, and this page is dated to the first day of that month. The
site's curator, Thomas Bloom, labels the problem proved and credits the
proof of Littlewood's conjecture independently to this paper and to
Konyagin, whose
claim page records
Konyagin's proof; that curator credit is the reviewed evidence.
Formalization. The linked Lean file in the Jayyhk/erdos-lean
repository, pinned at the commit in the link, proves
theorem erdos_512 :
∃ K : ℝ, 0 < K ∧ ∀ A : Finset ℤ,
K * Real.log A.card ≤
∫ θ in (0:ℝ)..1,
‖∑ n ∈ A, Complex.exp (2 * Real.pi * Complex.I * n * θ)‖(line breaks reflowed, tokens unchanged) with a docstring crediting the
result independently to Konyagin and to McGehee, Pigno and Smith, and its
proof cites the Annals paper and builds what its comments call the
McGehee–Pigno–Smith dual construction, so the file is recorded here as a
formalization of this paper's proof. The proof was produced by the AI system
Aristotle (Harmonic): the repository's README states that each proof file
imports only Mathlib, lists this problem as complete and points to the
sources field of its data/problems.yaml for original sources, and that
entry for problem 512 lists an Aristotle request together with the one
comment of the site's discussion thread,
JoshuaB's post of 22 June 2026,
which reports that Aristotle used the paper of McGehee, Pigno and Smith to
formalize the problem. The file prints the axioms of erdos_512 and records
the output as a comment, [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]; the file
contains no sorry, axiom or native_decide token. The
statement file in google-deepmind/formal-conjectures
names this file as the formal proof and is itself a statement with sorry,
so it is not a formalization link. This corpus has not built or
kernel-checked the proof, so no formalized evidence is listed. The Lean
statement takes the logarithm of the set's size with Lean's convention that
the logarithm of and of is , which makes the cases
trivial and matches the question's asymptotic form.
Depends on. Nothing beyond the cited paper.