Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Subhajit Ghosh and Koushik Ramachandran, Number of components of polynomial lemniscates: a problem of Erdös, Herzog, and Piranian, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 540 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 128571 (arXiv:2312.13673v1 of 21 December 2023 is the preprint), answer the problem. For a compact K⊂CK\subset\mathbb C of positive logarithmic capacity c(K)c(K) (the transfinite diameter), let Cn(K)C_n(K) be the largest number of connected components of {z:∣p(z)∣<1}\{z:|p(z)|<1\} over monic pp of degree nn with all zeros in KK. Their Question 1.2 restates the problem of Erdős, Herzog and Piranian: is lim sup⁡nCn(K)/n<1\limsup_n C_n(K)/n<1 when c(K)<1c(K)<1, and, when c(K)=1c(K)=1 and KK lies in no closed disc of radius 11, can Cn(K)C_n(K) equal nn along a subsequence of degrees? Theorem 2.1(a) gives the first answer: 0<c(K)<10<c(K)<1 implies lim sup⁡nCn(K)/n<1\limsup_n C_n(K)/n<1, so Cn(K)≤(1−c)nC_n(K)\le(1-c)n for all large nn with a c>0c>0 depending on KK. The paper's notation restricts KK to positive capacity, so a closed set of capacity 00 lies outside the theorem's statement; it is covered all the same, since CnC_n is monotone in the set and adding a small closed disc DD to such a set gives a compact set of capacity c(D)∈(0,1)c(D)\in(0,1). The paper's remark after the theorem shows that M(K)=lim sup⁡nCn(K)/nM(K)=\limsup_n C_n(K)/n is not determined by the capacity. The closed disc of radius 1/21/2 and the segment [−1,1][-1,1] both have capacity 1/21/2. Every lemniscate over the disc has one component, so M=0M=0 there, while the segment has M>0M>0. Both sets have M<1M<1, so the remark does not decide the parenthetical variant, whether cc can be chosen depending only on the capacity. The paper does not treat that variant. Proposition 2.3 gives the second answer: a closed lemniscate K=Q−1(D‾)K=Q^{-1}(\overline{\mathbb D}), which has capacity 11, has Cn(K)=nC_n(K)=n for all nn in an infinite set. The proposition holds for every closed lemniscate, including the closed unit disc (Q(z)=zQ(z)=z), which the question's hypothesis excludes; a lemniscate lying in no closed disc of radius 11, such as {z:∣z2−1∣≤1}\{z:|z^2-1|\le1\}, which contains ±2\pm\sqrt2, meets the hypothesis and answers the question. Theorem 2.4 gives lim sup⁡nCn(K)/n=1\limsup_n C_n(K)/n=1 for the closure of a bounded Jordan domain with C2C^2 boundary of capacity 11. Above capacity 11, Theorem 2.2 gives Cn(K)=nC_n(K)=n for all large nn under a regularity or connectedness condition. The statements above were read from the arXiv preprint (v1), held on its library card; the proofs were not checked here.

Reviewed. The site's curator, Thomas Bloom, marks Problem 1042 proved and credits this paper in the site's commentary (last edited 12 April 2026).

Refereed. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 540 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 128571, as the Crossref record of the DOI gives it.