Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and every sufficiently large xx there are integers 1≤a1<⋯<ak≤x1\le a_1<\cdots<a_k\le x among whose partial products a1,a1a2,…,a1⋯aka_1,a_1a_2,\ldots,a_1\cdots a_k more than x1−ϵx^{1-\epsilon} are perfect squares. This answers the question of Problem 437 affirmatively.

The theorem behind it. For a positive integer nn let tnt_n be the least tt such that some subset of {n+1,…,n+t}\{n+1,\ldots,n+t\} has a product that makes nn times it a square. Theorem 1.2 of Bui, Pratt and Zaharescu (source card) states that, for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and large xx, at least

xexp⁡(−(322+ϵ)log⁡xlog⁡log⁡x)x\exp\bigl(-(\tfrac{3\sqrt2}{2}+\epsilon)\sqrt{\log x\log\log x}\bigr)

integers n≤xn\le x satisfy tn≤exp⁡((2+ϵ)log⁡nlog⁡log⁡n)t_n\le\exp\bigl(\sqrt{(2+\epsilon)\log n\log\log n}\bigr). The paper does not mention Problem 437; its subject is Granville's question about tnt_n and the integral points on hyperelliptic curves that control it.

The deduction. Terence Tao's post of 9 August 2024 draws the answer from that theorem. Writing L(x)L(x) for the largest possible number of square partial products and u(x)=(log⁡xlog⁡log⁡x)1/2u(x)=(\log x\log\log x)^{1/2}, Tao notes that the theorem, used as a black box, and an easy greedy argument give L(x)≥xexp⁡(−(522+o(1))u(x))L(x)\ge x\exp(-(\tfrac{5\sqrt2}{2}+o(1))u(x)), which exceeds x1−ϵx^{1-\epsilon}; the post does not write that argument out. The derivation it does write reworks the proof of the theorem: it counts the x1/ux^{1/u}-smooth numbers for uu of order (log⁡x/log⁡log⁡x)1/2(\log x/\log\log x)^{1/2}, observes that the exponent vectors modulo 22 of any π(x1/u)+1\pi(x^{1/u})+1 of them are linearly dependent over Z/2Z\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z, so that some subproduct of each such run is a square, and concatenates disjoint runs. This gives

xexp⁡(−(2+o(1))u(x))≤L(x)≤xexp⁡(−(2−1/2+o(1))u(x)).x\exp\bigl(-(\sqrt2+o(1))u(x)\bigr)\le L(x)\le x\exp\bigl(-(2^{-1/2}+o(1))u(x)\bigr).

Tao regards the lower bound as the likely truth and the upper-bound argument as the cruder of the two. Erdős and Graham called the bound L(x)=o(x)L(x)=o(x) trivial; the site remarks that it rests on Siegel's theorem.

Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos437.lean in Boris Alexeev's repository plby/lean-proofs, linked above at the commit the formal-conjectures statement cites, declares itself a Lean formalization of a solution to Problem 437, naming Bui, Pratt and Zaharescu as its informal authors and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors, with the paper and Tao's post as its mathematical sources. Its theorem erdos_437 states that for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and every sufficiently large xx there is an admissible sequence in [1,x][1,x] with more than x1−ϵx^{1-\epsilon} square partial products; its header says the combinatorial core is Lemma 4.2 of the paper and the only analytic input for the qualitative result is the prime number theorem. The formal-conjectures statement erdos_437, added 2026-09-20, is tagged solved and points its formal_proof attribute at that theorem. Nothing was built or audited here, so the page lists no formalized evidence.

Acceptance. Theorem 1.2 is refereed (Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 176 (2024), no. 2, 309-323, published online on 5 October 2023), but the paper does not state the answer to Problem 437; the deduction is Tao's post, which is not refereed, so refereed is not listed for this claim. The site's curator, Thomas Bloom, labels the problem proved and credits the work of Bui, Pratt and Zaharescu as Tao applied it, and Tao's post is a named expert's public derivation of the answer; that credit is the reviewed evidence. This repository has not reviewed the proof of Theorem 1.2 or Tao's derivation; the source card records the paper's statements.