Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. There are infinitely many four-term arithmetic progressions of powerful numbers whose four terms are pairwise coprime. This answers Problem 937 affirmatively. The result is Proposition 5.2 of Bajpai, Bennett and Chan, and the case of their Theorem 1.2, in Arithmetic progressions in squarefull numbers, Int. J. Number Theory 20 (2024), no. 1, 19–45, first posted as arXiv:2302.03113 on 2023-02-06; the source card is bajpai_2024_arithmetic_progressions_squarefull_numbers. The theorem as printed asks only that the first term and the common difference be coprime; the construction gives pairwise coprime terms, which is what the problem asks for.
Construction. Three terms are taken to be squares and the fourth to be . The condition on the fourth term becomes a rational point on an elliptic curve; a division-polynomial computation modulo and a -adic parity argument show that a residue class of multiples of a fixed point gives infinitely many progressions (up to reversal), and a direct gcd argument makes every pair of terms coprime.
Acceptance. The paper is refereed: Int. J. Number Theory 20 (2024), no. 1,
19–45. The site's curator, Thomas Bloom, marks Problem 937 proved and credits
this paper for the proof. The community database (teorth/erdosproblems) further records
the problem as proved in Lean: the formal-conjectures statement for Problem 937 carries a
formal-proof attribute pointing at the Lean 4 file linked above, which declares
itself a formalization of this paper's solution (informal authors Bajpai,
Bennett and Chan; formal authors recorded as the AI systems Codex and GPT-5.6
Sol) and proves that the set of pairs with and $a, a+d, a+2d,
a+3d$ pairwise coprime and powerful is infinite, following the same
elliptic-curve orbit modulo . That file is linked as the claimant's
formalization; this corpus has not built or audited it, so it is not listed as
formalized evidence.
Depends on. No other wiki page; the claim rests on the cited paper.