Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. For every and every there are with
so the answer to Problem 67 is yes. This is Corollary 1.2 of the paper, the sign-valued case of its Theorem 1.1, which gives the same conclusion for every whose values have norm one in a real or complex Hilbert space. The paper is held as Tao 2016.
Argument. The proof has three steps. A Fourier-analytic reduction from the Polymath5 project replaces by a random completely multiplicative function with values in the unit circle whose discrepancy controls that of . The author's logarithmically averaged form of the Elliott conjecture then forces such a to behave like a modulated Dirichlet character. An extension of a further Polymath5 argument shows that character-like functions still have unbounded discrepancy. The unit-norm hypothesis at every is necessary: a non-principal Dirichlet character of period has discrepancy at most but vanishes on the multiples of .
Acceptance. Refereed: Discrete Analysis 2016, Paper No. 1, published 2016-02-28, following the preprint arXiv:1509.05363 of 2015-09-17 (six versions, the last of 2017-01-13). Reviewed: the site's curator, T. F. Bloom, records the question as true and proved by Tao in the problem's commentary (page last edited 2026-04-17, read 2026-10-07); the curator is independent of the author. The community database, which the claimant maintains, also lists the problem as proved; that listing is not independent review. The only formalization recorded is the statement in formal-conjectures, linked from the problem page; no kernel-checked proof is recorded, and this corpus has audited none.
Not covered. Erdős's further conjecture, stated in several of the problem's sources, that the maximum over grows at least like is a separate question the paper leaves open. Its Example 1.4, the Borwein--Choi--Coons function, is a completely multiplicative whose discrepancy up to is comparable to , so the conjectured order would be sharp, and its Example 1.5 is a unit-vector-valued whose discrepancy grows only like ; the paper conjectures that is best possible for Theorem 1.1, says it is unclear whether a sequence can grow that slowly, and notes that its argument gives an explicit lower bound in principle, one likely far too weak to reach . The site records McNamara's lower bound of order for the variant in which and (McNamara's 2021 UCLA dissertation, Chapter 4, entry [Mc21] on the problem page), and Erdős's question about multiplicative . Neither bears on the standing of the question above.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result is the paper's own theorem.