Wiki
Wiki

Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.

Updated


Claim. P. Erdős, Számelméleti megjegyzések, V. Extremális problémák a számelméletben, II (Remarks on number theory, V. Extremal problems in number theory, II), Mat. Lapok 17 (1966), 135--155, cited as [Er66] on the problem page. Section I.9 (printed p. 137) reports that Cantor, Schreiber, Straus and Erdős independently constructed a function φ:N→{−1,1}\varphi:\mathbb N\to\{-1,1\} such that for every fixed aa and dd the partial sums ∑k≤mφ(a+kd)\sum_{k\le m}\varphi(a+kd) are bounded in mm, so that l(a,d)=sup⁡m∣∑k≤mφ(a+kd)∣l(a,d)=\sup_m\lvert\sum_{k\le m}\varphi(a+kd)\rvert is finite, using the antisymmetry φ(u)=−φ(m+u)\varphi(u)=-\varphi(m+u); that the numbers l(a,d)l(a,d) cannot be bounded uniformly; and that for L(d)=max⁡al(a,d)L(d)=\max_al(a,d) the example, worked out, gives the upper bound L(d)<cdd!L(d)<c^dd!, with no good lower bound known. In the notation of Problem 177 this is h(d)<cdd!h(d)<c^dd!, so h(d)h(d) is finite for every dd. The paper prints no proof beyond the antisymmetry remark. The source is carded at erdos_1966_szamelmeleti_megjegyzesek.

Covers. The upper bound h(d)<cdd!h(d)<c^dd! alone, and with it the existence of the function the problem asks about. The site's commentary records the bound as h(d)≪d!h(d)\ll d!, which drops the factor cdc^d. The result settles nothing about the order of h(d)h(d), which the problem asks for; Beck's and Korsky's polynomial bounds, on their own claim pages, supersede it.

Depends on. No page of this wiki.

Acceptance. Refereed: the paper is a journal publication in Matematikai Lapok, volume 17 (1966), the refereed evidence; the volume carries no month or day, so this page is dated to the first day of that year. The site's curator credits the bound to [Er66] in the problem's commentary, but the site labels the problem OPEN, so that credit is not reviewed evidence. The statement is as printed on p. 137; the paper gives no proof of the bound to check, and nothing is independently reviewed by this project.