Research notes on every problem, and a library of the papers behind them. Built from the open erdos repository.
Updated
Claim. With the largest deviation, over spherical caps , of the count from its expectation ,
for finite sets on the unit sphere , so the answer to Problem 988 is yes. Schmidt proves it for the sphere of every dimension, as the fourth part of his series on irregularities of distribution. The analogous statement for the unit square, with axis-parallel boxes in place of caps, is Roth's theorem of 1954, which the problem's sources name as the model for the question.
Depends on. Nothing in this wiki; the result rests on the cited paper alone.
Dating. The page is dated by the issue month the journal record gives (Invent. Math. 7 (1969), 55–82, March 1969); the day in the page name is a placeholder.
Acceptance. Refereed: Invent. Math. 7 (1969), 55–82. Reviewed: the site's curator, Thomas Bloom, credits Schmidt's paper with the affirmative answer in the problem's commentary (read 2026-10-07; the site's thread holds no comment and no proof claim), and the community database lists the problem as solved. The claim value is proved: the problem asks a yes-or-no question and the theorem answers it yes. The paper is not held here, so the quantitative lower bound it gives is not transcribed on this page.
Formalization. The file src/latest/ErdosProblems/Erdos988.lean of Boris
Alexeev's lean-proofs repository (GitHub plby/lean-proofs), linked above
at the commit read and first added, declares itself a Lean
formalization of a solution to the problem, with Schmidt as its informal
author and Codex and GPT-5.6 Sol as its formal authors. For Lean and Mathlib
v4.33.0 it defines the spherical cap discrepancy of a finite
as the supremum, over the closed caps
with , of
with
, and the minimum discrepancy of -point sets as an
infimum; it proves card_le_512_mul_discrepancy_pow_four, that
for every finite , and from it
erdos_988, that the minimum discrepancy tends to infinity with . Its
route is not Schmidt's: by its header it is the elementary Stolarsky
positive-kernel argument, and it cites Bilyk and Brauchart's 2025 preprint on
lower bounds for the spherical cap discrepancy beside Schmidt's paper.
Neither the site's indicator nor the community database points to the file.
It is not built or audited here and has no fidelity review, so formalized
is not listed; the evidence of this claim is the refereed paper and the
curator's acceptance.